Re: The Head of the U.S. Coast Guard Isn't Afraid to Talk About Climate Change

From	Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate
Subject	Re: The Head of the U.S. Coast Guard Isn't Afraid to Talk About Climate Change
Date	2018-05-07 10:04 +1000
Message-ID	<fl9jhdFfu7nU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<pcmimd$1s2d$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pcn2mg$li7$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fl95cnFd12eU1@mid.individual.net> <pcnoc1$1pjq$2@gioia.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/05/2018 6:25 AM, Sergio wrote:
> On 5/6/2018 3:03 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 7/05/2018 12:15 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>> On 5/6/2018 4:42 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> Even as other government agencies have quietly banished references to
>>>> climate change, the head of the U.S. Coast Guard does not shy away from
>>>> the subject that the White House has made practically taboo:
>>>>
>>>> http://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/04/the-head-of-the-u-s-coast-guard-isnt-afraid-to-talk-about-climate-change/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> yep, by golly, that 0.1 mm/year sea rise,
>>
>> **Try an OBSERVED (not predicted, nor modelled) rate of 2.8 ~ 3.6mm PA.
>> With the increased melt from Greenland, that rate is expected to increase.
>>
> 
> OOOOOOOOOOOOOhhh  MMMYY  !!
> 
> the Coastguard ships cannot withstand 1/10 of an inch of rise in water
> level !!!

**Here is YOUR claim:

"yep, by golly, that 0.1 mm/year sea rise, computer predicted by some
aggressive global worming computer modeling problems on closed data, has
worried the shit out of some unemployed contract journalists on how they
can make money off it."


Do you now admit your lie?

> 
>>
>>   computer predicted by some
>>> aggressive global worming computer modeling problems on closed data,
>>
>> **Well, given your data is hopelessly wrong, we can safely disregard
>> your lies.
>>
>>
>>   has
>>> worried the shit out of some unemployed contract journalists on how they
>>> can make money off it.
>>>
>>
>> **How about you supply real data?
> 
> no need, the article is FAKE NEWS on its face.
> 

**How about your lies? When will you take responsibility for them? Here, 
again, are your lies:

"yep, by golly, that 0.1 mm/year sea rise, computer predicted by some
aggressive global worming computer modeling problems on closed data, has
worried the shit out of some unemployed contract journalists on how they
can make money off it."

Here's your chance to admit your lies and apologise, once and for all. 
Do it now, or will you dig yourself an even deeper hole?


-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

Thread

csiph-web