Re: The Head of the U.S. Coast Guard Isn't Afraid to Talk About Climate Change

Subject	Re: The Head of the U.S. Coast Guard Isn't Afraid to Talk About Climate Change
Newsgroups	sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate
References	<pcmimd$1s2d$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pcn2mg$li7$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fl95cnFd12eU1@mid.individual.net> <pcnoc1$1pjq$2@gioia.aioe.org> <fl9jhdFfu7nU1@mid.individual.net>
From	benj <benj@nobody.net>
Message-ID	<8dQHC.119962$mS3.101025@fx04.iad> (permalink)
Date	2018-05-07 00:02 -0400

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/6/2018 8:04 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 7/05/2018 6:25 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 5/6/2018 3:03 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 7/05/2018 12:15 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> On 5/6/2018 4:42 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> Even as other government agencies have quietly banished references to
>>>>> climate change, the head of the U.S. Coast Guard does not shy away 
>>>>> from
>>>>> the subject that the White House has made practically taboo:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/04/the-head-of-the-u-s-coast-guard-isnt-afraid-to-talk-about-climate-change/ 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> yep, by golly, that 0.1 mm/year sea rise,
>>>
>>> **Try an OBSERVED (not predicted, nor modelled) rate of 2.8 ~ 3.6mm PA.
>>> With the increased melt from Greenland, that rate is expected to 
>>> increase.
>>>
>>
>> OOOOOOOOOOOOOhhh  MMMYY  !!
>>
>> the Coastguard ships cannot withstand 1/10 of an inch of rise in water
>> level !!!
> 
> **Here is YOUR claim:
> 
> "yep, by golly, that 0.1 mm/year sea rise, computer predicted by some
> aggressive global worming computer modeling problems on closed data, has
> worried the shit out of some unemployed contract journalists on how they
> can make money off it."
> 
> 
> Do you now admit your lie?
> 
>>
>>>
>>>   computer predicted by some
>>>> aggressive global worming computer modeling problems on closed data,
>>>
>>> **Well, given your data is hopelessly wrong, we can safely disregard
>>> your lies.
>>>
>>>
>>>   has
>>>> worried the shit out of some unemployed contract journalists on how 
>>>> they
>>>> can make money off it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> **How about you supply real data?
>>
>> no need, the article is FAKE NEWS on its face.
>>
> 
> **How about your lies? When will you take responsibility for them? Here, 
> again, are your lies:
> 
> "yep, by golly, that 0.1 mm/year sea rise, computer predicted by some
> aggressive global worming computer modeling problems on closed data, has
> worried the shit out of some unemployed contract journalists on how they
> can make money off it."
> 
> Here's your chance to admit your lies and apologise, once and for all. 
> Do it now, or will you dig yourself an even deeper hole?
> 
> 
Actually BOTH Sergio and Trevor need spanked. The .1mm/year figure is 
just wrong. The correct MEASURED figure is about 2mm a year. Sea rises 
as high as 3mm or so have been measured but as usual Trevor is seep in 
lies trying to call it greenland runoff. The 3mm figures are from GROUND 
WATER PUMPING (namely land SINKING not sea rising) Trevor is big into 
fake news.

PS. The 2mm figure is due to ending glaciation period and has been at 
this level LONG before industrial revolution and SUVs. It's all a fake 
scam trying to bamboozle the ignornate public who thinks that glaciers 
melting and sea level rises are some new recent thing. ALl FAke. ALl 
lies. After the end of the glaciation seas rode 400 FEET! Oh my! Are you 
all scared yet? Oh Trevor! What oh what can we do? And the tail of thar 
rise is still going one.

Trevor why don't you just give up on the warming scam and make some 
money with Nigerian prince emails?

Thread

csiph-web