Re: Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here.

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate
Subject	Re: Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here.
Date	2018-03-29 11:33 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<p9j4i2$1m67$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <p9gh7o$1b2s$2@gioia.aioe.org> <p9gl36$1ip0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <p9i0i2$ng4$4@dont-email.me> <p9iq5a$115g$1@gioia.aioe.org> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.29--9.18am.Seattle.2018>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/29/2018 11:18 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> Facebook gave your "personal" info to the Obama 2012 campaign.
>> Usenet is dead; how many people actually posted here, last month ?
>>   1,000s ?  100's ?  16.
> 
> Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here;
> 165, if you count the 49 people I plonked and the 80 "Shifties".

yep 36 regulars, so most all of the newsgroups are quite small now.
I think Windows has been cut off its interfaces with news servers,
perhaps Thunderbird too, .

I got aioe on, but cant get eternal-september nor news server.net,
 no place to sign in, it is not offered user name and password form for
sending to a server.... (thunderbird)

> 
> You (Sergio) post over 9 times/Day; 205 last 3 Weeks.
> You use ThunderBird on Win7; "Aioe.ORG" is your (crappy) server.
> You posted to:
> 
>   Sci.Physics, Talk.Politics.Guns, Alt.Checkmate, 
>     Sci.Physics.Relativity, Alt.Astronomy, Rec.Food.Cooking, 
>     Alt.Fan.Cyberchicken

I dont post to Rec.Food.Cooking,  Alt.Fan.Cyberchicken, or
Sci.Physics.Relativity, perhaps somebody added on newsgroups, aioe only
likes 3 groups or less.....

> 
> Your "Subject:" lines:
> 
>   Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank)
>   solutions manual to Fundamentals of Database Systems
>   Why Do Vorticces Exist in the Atmosphere ?
>   Arctic wintertime sea ice extent is among lowest on record
>   It's 50 years since climate change was first seen.
>   Potato Production and Climate Change
> 
> Jeff-Relf.Me/Phy_Regs.HTM
> 

hi, do you know of some other free anon posting news servers ?
OR near free ?

Thread

Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-27 07:50 -0400
  Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-03-27 08:15 -0400
    Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 18:32 -0400
      Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-03-27 23:40 +0100
        Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-27 23:28 +0000
          Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 20:07 -0400
            Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 18:17 -0600
              Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 21:43 -0400
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 20:15 -0600
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-28 04:47 +0000
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 00:19 -0600
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-28 07:53 +0000
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 05:41 -0600
            Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-28 04:46 +0000
              Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-28 07:23 -0400
              Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-28 09:55 -0500
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 09:22 -0600
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-28 12:52 -0400
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-28 12:57 -0500
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-29 06:19 +0000
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 08:36 -0500
                Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-03-29 09:18 -0700
                Re: Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 11:33 -0500
                Just use the server, with no UserName/PassWord specified. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-03-29 10:03 -0700
                Re: Just use the server, with no UserName/PassWord specified. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 14:21 -0400
                Thunderbird is wonderful -if- you know how to configure it. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-03-29 12:46 -0700
                Re: Thunderbird is wonderful -if- you know how to configure it. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 14:33 -0700
                Re: Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 14:06 -0400
                Re: Seeing your stuff doesn't mean I care about it. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 17:57 -0400
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-29 07:37 -0600
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-29 10:04 -0400
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-29 08:11 -0600
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 11:17 -0500
            Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-03-30 09:04 +1100
              Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 19:30 -0400
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-03-30 16:51 +1100
  Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 07:07 -0600
    Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 18:36 -0400
      Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 16:40 -0600
        Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 19:39 -0400
          Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 17:46 -0600
            Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-28 10:53 -0500
              Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 09:00 -0700
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 11:38 -0600
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 10:41 -0700
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 11:58 -0600
              Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 11:38 -0600
        Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 16:41 -0700
          Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 17:47 -0600
            Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 17:00 -0700
              Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 18:07 -0600
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 17:26 -0700
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 18:40 -0600
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 17:45 -0700
          Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-03-27 22:12 -0400
  Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-27 09:38 -0500
    Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 10:22 -0700
      Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-27 13:25 -0500
        Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 15:28 -0700
          Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-27 20:20 -0500
          Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-03-28 08:07 -0700
            Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 08:10 -0700
              Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 09:20 -0600
                Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-28 12:55 -0400
                Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 10:00 -0700
            Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 10:08 -0700
              Re: Less Freedom. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 14:23 -0400
                Re: Less Freedom. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 15:28 -0500
  Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 18:32 -0400
    Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 06:14 -0700
      Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-28 09:56 -0500
        Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 10:06 -0700
    Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-03-29 19:41 +1100

csiph-web