Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #679104
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate |
| Subject | Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers |
| Date | 2018-03-30 16:51 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <fi61k6F67mjU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <1nmchpw.1x9kuoe1fx9yypN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <p9ek3g$e6k$1@dont-email.me> <p1BuC.73312$LZ3.19582@fx35.iad> <fi566uFrnbU1@mid.individual.net> <8GevC.43135$Fg4.8079@fx23.iad> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 30/03/2018 10:30 AM, benj wrote: > On 3/29/2018 6:04 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 28/03/2018 11:07 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 3/27/2018 7:28 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 23:40:43 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: >>>> >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 3/27/2018 8:15 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:50:07 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-change-goes-firmly- >>>>>>>> >>>> in-the-loss-column-for-insurers/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you post *anything* upbeat? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Does "she" ever post anything that is true? >>>>> >>>>> No, HTH >>>> >>>> It took a while, but now we have you on the record making a firm >>>> statement >>>> that amounts to clinate change denial. >>> >>> Nonsense. Absolute lie. Lefties never do honesty. As I have said here >>> MANY times, the ONE principle that absolutely EVERYONE in science >>> agrees upon is "the certainty of change". It is you kooktards who >>> think that you can stop the planet and keep change from happening. >>> That makes YOU the 'science denier". >>> >>>> Which in turn pins down your politics as right-wing, something >>>> you've also >>>> tried to maintain deniability about. >>> >>> Right-wing schmite-wing. You are drooling again. What you accused me >>> of was being a Trump supporter. This is FAR from the case. Blowhard >>> sales types are not my favorite people though higher up than leftist >>> commies like yourself. Didn't you get the memo about the fall of your >>> utopian USSR? Your system is totally discredited by the largest >>> social experiment in history. No wonder only North Korea and >>> Democrats are the only ones left refusing to accept the data. >>> >>>> There's no bigger coward than one who will not go clearly on the >>>> record as >>>> believing what they believe, because it happens to be unpopular. >>> >>> I not only go on record I CONSISTENTLY back up my views with peer >>> reviewed science that I regularly post in response to "kensi's" cut >>> and paste journalist propaganda. >> >> **Liar. You NEVER post anything resembling science to any question or >> comment I make. Not once, not ever. > > The liar is YOU. **LOL. Let's see. Like al lefty Libs you don't do truth but DO do alling > other people names and slandering them to further you political scams. > The ends justifies the means, right? And now you have shown that you and > "kensi"/Nads are all part of the same big scamming family! You are as > ready to lie for them as you are to lie for yourself. > > Here is a REPOST of GISS data I have posted many times? **NO repost. As usual, you lying sack of shit. Any idea what > GISS data is? **I know EXACTLY what it is. I also know what cherry-picked data is. Do you? Do you know who Dr. Hansen the godfather of global warming > is? **The so-called 'Godfather' of global warming was Joseph Fourier. After him, came Svante Arrhenius. Both men set the tone for global warming research way back in the NINETEENTH century! Which is information you would know, if you took the time to study the science. Do you recognize HIS data? **Well, since you failed (yet again) to present any data, no. Like I said: You NEVER present anything resembling science to back you idiotic claims. SOP. Do you notice that from 1940 - 1970 > these data showed Temperature going DOWN while CO2 went up? **Yes. And that has been explained to you in exquisite detail many, many times previously. Do you ever pay attention? It is due to aerosol pollution, caused by industry and motor vehicles. You may care to note (but you probably won't) that temperatures began to rise when governments around the world got serious about reducing aerosol pollution. Here's some science that you won't bother reading (nor understand): https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/science-and-impacts/science/aerosols-and-global-warming-faq.html#.Wr3OO39x1pg And you have > the absolute balls to say this proves that CO2 "causes" warming? **Idiot. The science is undeniable. How > ignorant are you anyway. **I assume that was a question. I am clearly a whole lot less ignorant that you. Why don't you show how much science you know > down in Oz and explain how radiative forcing made this happen? **Certainly. CO2 is resonant at a couple of infra-red frequencies. When infra-red (IR) hits those CO2 molecules, it causes them to vibrate (accumulate kinetic energy). More IR = more kinetic energy. The CO2 molecules are agitated sufficiently to transfer some of their energy to nearby molecules of atmospheric gases (nitrogen, oxygen, et al), thus raising the energy level of the entire system. Most critically, CO2 acts at night, when IR energy is re-radiated from the Earth's surface, thus nighttime temperatures are raised. > > You are all liars criminals and scammers trying to set up a fake tax to > steal trillions of dollars. Shame on YOU. **I am not trying to set up any kind of tax. > >> Neither YOU nor "kensi" EVER respond to any >>> of it, >> >> >> **Pot, kettle, black, you lying sack of shit. You cannot put forward a >> cogent argument when I question you. You just scurry away. Like you >> will when you see this post. > > Liar. **You keep saying that, but you have failed to respond to my previous posts in this area. That make YOU the lying cunt. Not me. You simple babble on with your propaganda when I present you with > scientific data and then (see above) you lie and say I never did. **You failed to supply ANY scientific data. That makes YOU the lying cunt. Take > it easy on the drugs man, your fantasies are really getting strong. **Let me remind you: _I_ am not the one who failed to supply the data. You are. > >> instead simply resorting to immature name-calling and repeating >>> your lies over an over. As Sergio has pointed out, there has never >>> been ONE equation coming out of you or your sock, "kensi". And that >>> makes you a fraud. >> >> **Actually, it is YOU who is the fraud. Not only do you fail to >> respond, but you fail to admit when you have been shown to be wrong. > > You have not shown any of the science I CONSTANTLY present as wrong. **Lying does not make you correct. It just makes you a liar. YOU > simply lie and name-call and repeat your fear-mongering propaganda over > and over. It's propaganda 101. Nothing new. Nothing of value either. > > So start with discussing how CO2 radiative forcing is adding energy yet > temperatures are going down. This is a real "causality" trick! **Huh? Prove that temperatures are going down. > > We'll wait right here for your answer. **Telling a lie, then asking ME to prove your lie is not going to happen. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-27 07:50 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-03-27 08:15 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 18:32 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-03-27 23:40 +0100
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-27 23:28 +0000
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 20:07 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 18:17 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 21:43 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 20:15 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-28 04:47 +0000
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 00:19 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-28 07:53 +0000
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 05:41 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-28 04:46 +0000
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-28 07:23 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-28 09:55 -0500
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 09:22 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-28 12:52 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-28 12:57 -0500
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-29 06:19 +0000
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 08:36 -0500
Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-29 09:18 -0700
Re: Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 11:33 -0500
Just use the server, with no UserName/PassWord specified. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-29 10:03 -0700
Re: Just use the server, with no UserName/PassWord specified. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 14:21 -0400
Thunderbird is wonderful -if- you know how to configure it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-29 12:46 -0700
Re: Thunderbird is wonderful -if- you know how to configure it. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 14:33 -0700
Re: Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 14:06 -0400
Re: Seeing your stuff doesn't mean I care about it. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 17:57 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-29 07:37 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-29 10:04 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-29 08:11 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 11:17 -0500
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-03-30 09:04 +1100
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 19:30 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-03-30 16:51 +1100
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 07:07 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 18:36 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 16:40 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 19:39 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 17:46 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-28 10:53 -0500
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 09:00 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 11:38 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 10:41 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 11:58 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 11:38 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 16:41 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 17:47 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 17:00 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 18:07 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 17:26 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 18:40 -0600
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 17:45 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-03-27 22:12 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-27 09:38 -0500
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 10:22 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-27 13:25 -0500
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 15:28 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-27 20:20 -0500
Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-28 08:07 -0700
Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 08:10 -0700
Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 09:20 -0600
Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-28 12:55 -0400
Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 10:00 -0700
Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 10:08 -0700
Re: Less Freedom. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 14:23 -0400
Re: Less Freedom. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 15:28 -0500
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 18:32 -0400
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 06:14 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-28 09:56 -0500
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 10:06 -0700
Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-03-29 19:41 +1100
csiph-web