Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers

From	Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate
Subject	Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers
Date	2018-03-29 19:41 +1100
Message-ID	<fi3n5vFkrjfU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<p9db5k$1pks$1@gioia.aioe.org> <0EzuC.79378$q15.42657@fx34.iad>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 28/03/2018 9:32 AM, benj wrote:
> On 3/27/2018 7:50 AM, kensi wrote:
>> Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers:
>>
>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-change-goes-firmly-in-the-loss-column-for-insurers/ 
>>
> 
> Sci-Am = Journalist Pseudo-science. No real science at Sci-Am for years!

**Really? You sure about that?

Post your proof of your claim. While you are at it, tell us about these 
scientific journals. Are they also pseudo-science?

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01333

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/01/even-without-el-ni-o-2017-temperatures-still-soared

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-02992-9

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023162

http://www.pnas.org/content/114/19/4881

http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/464/2094/1367


> 
> "Kensi" and "journalists" are still playing the fraud that increased 
> storm damage is due to more severe weather rather than increased 
> population in denser urban development. A total disingenuous 
> misrepresentation.

**"Fraud"? OK, I'll ask once more: Please submit your own scientific 
credentials as they relate to climate science, so that we may take your 
claims seriously.


> 
> "kensi", you need to understand the in science lies and deceptions 
> unlike politics (especially leftist politics) are considered unethical 
> behavior and reason to be kicked out of science.
> 
> Please post your actual name and address so we can inform your employer 
> of your unacceptable internet behavior.

**How about you respond to my previous questions, you lying sack of shit?


-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-27 07:50 -0400
  Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-03-27 08:15 -0400
    Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 18:32 -0400
      Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-03-27 23:40 +0100
        Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-27 23:28 +0000
          Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 20:07 -0400
            Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 18:17 -0600
              Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 21:43 -0400
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 20:15 -0600
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-28 04:47 +0000
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 00:19 -0600
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-28 07:53 +0000
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 05:41 -0600
            Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-28 04:46 +0000
              Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-28 07:23 -0400
              Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-28 09:55 -0500
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 09:22 -0600
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-28 12:52 -0400
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-28 12:57 -0500
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-29 06:19 +0000
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 08:36 -0500
                Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-03-29 09:18 -0700
                Re: Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 11:33 -0500
                Just use the server, with no UserName/PassWord specified. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-03-29 10:03 -0700
                Re: Just use the server, with no UserName/PassWord specified. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 14:21 -0400
                Thunderbird is wonderful -if- you know how to configure it. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-03-29 12:46 -0700
                Re: Thunderbird is wonderful -if- you know how to configure it. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 14:33 -0700
                Re: Last 30 days, there were about 36 "people" (nyms) worth reading here. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 14:06 -0400
                Re: Seeing your stuff doesn't mean I care about it. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 17:57 -0400
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-29 07:37 -0600
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-29 10:04 -0400
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-29 08:11 -0600
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 11:17 -0500
            Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-03-30 09:04 +1100
              Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 19:30 -0400
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-03-30 16:51 +1100
  Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 07:07 -0600
    Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 18:36 -0400
      Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 16:40 -0600
        Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 19:39 -0400
          Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 17:46 -0600
            Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-28 10:53 -0500
              Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 09:00 -0700
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 11:38 -0600
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 10:41 -0700
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 11:58 -0600
              Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 11:38 -0600
        Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 16:41 -0700
          Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 17:47 -0600
            Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 17:00 -0700
              Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 18:07 -0600
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 17:26 -0700
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-27 18:40 -0600
                Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 17:45 -0700
          Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-03-27 22:12 -0400
  Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-27 09:38 -0500
    Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 10:22 -0700
      Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-27 13:25 -0500
        Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 15:28 -0700
          Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-27 20:20 -0500
          Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-03-28 08:07 -0700
            Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 08:10 -0700
              Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-28 09:20 -0600
                Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-28 12:55 -0400
                Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 10:00 -0700
            Re: Suppose everyone believed transgender blacks were an insurance risk. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 10:08 -0700
              Re: Less Freedom. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 14:23 -0400
                Re: Less Freedom. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 15:28 -0500
  Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-27 18:32 -0400
    Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 06:14 -0700
      Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-28 09:56 -0500
        Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 10:06 -0700
    Re: Climate Change Goes Firmly in the "Loss" Column for Insurers Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-03-29 19:41 +1100

csiph-web