Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #408347
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: the LIGO signal |
| Date | 2017-02-08 05:27 +0100 |
| Organization | Good company |
| Message-ID | <o7e6kn$a7n$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <f33c9c3c-781a-429d-8a94-0f737476e94a@googlegroups.com> <525eb813-a980-4625-af1c-cd0c6ff57802@googlegroups.com> <efthr8Fohv2U1@mid.individual.net> <589a48da$0$61760$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com> |
Dne 07/02/2017 v 23:23 benj napsal(a): > On 2/7/2017 4:20 AM, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 7/02/2017 10:15 AM, numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >>> Sylvia, >>> >>> The frequency represent an EM gravity wave. >>> >> >> A wave has a type - electromagnetic, gravity, pressure, etc. >> >> A wave has a frequency. >> >> They are independent aspects of a wave. You cannot deduce one from the >> other. >> >> Sylvia >> > And contrary to popular belief today, waves have a medium in which they > propagate property values. ..if they are waves of medium property values. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
the LIGO signal RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-29 16:35 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-30 13:03 +1100
Re: the LIGO signal RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-30 18:46 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-31 14:10 +1100
Re: the LIGO signal mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-01-30 23:36 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-31 18:47 +1100
Re: the LIGO signal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 07:07 -0600
Re: the LIGO signal "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-31 09:16 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-31 15:01 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 17:33 -0600
Re: the LIGO signal "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 00:04 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-31 00:27 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 16:30 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-06 11:40 +1100
Re: the LIGO signal numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-06 15:15 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-07 20:20 +1100
Re: the LIGO signal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 17:23 -0500
Re: the LIGO signal Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 05:27 +0100
Re: the LIGO signal numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-07 13:42 -0800
Re: the LIGO signal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 18:06 -0500
Re: the LIGO signal Emmaline Coots <ealoa@loealoioa.los> - 2017-02-08 10:58 +0000
Re: the LIGO signal numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 11:27 -0800
csiph-web