Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #408205

Re: the LIGO signal

From Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: the LIGO signal
Date 2017-02-07 20:20 +1100
Message-ID <efthr8Fohv2U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <f33c9c3c-781a-429d-8a94-0f737476e94a@googlegroups.com> <525eb813-a980-4625-af1c-cd0c6ff57802@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/02/2017 10:15 AM, numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote:
> Sylvia,
>
> The frequency represent an EM gravity wave.
>

A wave has a type - electromagnetic, gravity, pressure, etc.

A wave has a frequency.

They are independent aspects of a wave. You cannot deduce one from the 
other.

Sylvia

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

the LIGO signal RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-29 16:35 -0800
  Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-30 13:03 +1100
    Re: the LIGO signal RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-30 18:46 -0800
      Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-31 14:10 +1100
        Re: the LIGO signal mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-01-30 23:36 -0800
          Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-31 18:47 +1100
      Re: the LIGO signal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 07:07 -0600
        Re: the LIGO signal "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-31 09:16 -0800
        Re: the LIGO signal RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-31 15:01 -0800
          Re: the LIGO signal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 17:33 -0600
  Re: the LIGO signal "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 00:04 -0800
    Re: the LIGO signal "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-31 00:27 -0800
  Re: the LIGO signal numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 16:30 -0800
    Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-06 11:40 +1100
  Re: the LIGO signal numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-06 15:15 -0800
    Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-07 20:20 +1100
      Re: the LIGO signal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 17:23 -0500
        Re: the LIGO signal Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 05:27 +0100
  Re: the LIGO signal numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-07 13:42 -0800
    Re: the LIGO signal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 18:06 -0500
      Re: the LIGO signal Emmaline Coots <ealoa@loealoioa.los> - 2017-02-08 10:58 +0000
  Re: the LIGO signal numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 11:27 -0800

csiph-web