Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #408040

Re: the LIGO signal

From Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: the LIGO signal
Date 2017-02-06 11:40 +1100
Message-ID <efpv07F2tahU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <f33c9c3c-781a-429d-8a94-0f737476e94a@googlegroups.com> <c2ea4e66-dfef-4947-b0c5-100a286fc4aa@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 6/02/2017 11:30 AM, numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote:
> The Caltech-MIT laser interferometer gravitational wave observatory
> (LIGO) detected gravity waves that originate from the merging of two
> blackbody holes 1.3 billion light years from the earth. The described
> gravity waves propagate to the earth at the velocity of light and
> produce 35 to 250 Hz acoustical chirps that vibrate the armature of a
> laser interferometer forming the signal of the celestial gravity
> waves but the LIGO gravity waves represent the frequency of sound
> that cannot propagate in the vacuum of celestial space at the
> velocity of light.
>

What on Earth gives you the impression that the frequency has anything 
to do with whether it can propagate through a vacuum.

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

the LIGO signal RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-29 16:35 -0800
  Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-30 13:03 +1100
    Re: the LIGO signal RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-30 18:46 -0800
      Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-31 14:10 +1100
        Re: the LIGO signal mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-01-30 23:36 -0800
          Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-01-31 18:47 +1100
      Re: the LIGO signal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 07:07 -0600
        Re: the LIGO signal "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-31 09:16 -0800
        Re: the LIGO signal RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-31 15:01 -0800
          Re: the LIGO signal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 17:33 -0600
  Re: the LIGO signal "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 00:04 -0800
    Re: the LIGO signal "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-31 00:27 -0800
  Re: the LIGO signal numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 16:30 -0800
    Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-06 11:40 +1100
  Re: the LIGO signal numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-06 15:15 -0800
    Re: the LIGO signal Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-07 20:20 +1100
      Re: the LIGO signal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 17:23 -0500
        Re: the LIGO signal Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 05:27 +0100
  Re: the LIGO signal numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-07 13:42 -0800
    Re: the LIGO signal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 18:06 -0500
      Re: the LIGO signal Emmaline Coots <ealoa@loealoioa.los> - 2017-02-08 10:58 +0000
  Re: the LIGO signal numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 11:27 -0800

csiph-web