Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #610287

Re: How dumb and stupid is Archimedes Plutonium in physics?

Show all headers | View raw

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>On Friday, December 23, 2016 at 8:44:12 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>> <snip crap>
>> 
>> So all you have is insults, no actual science?  Typical for you.
>> 
>> Admit it, you were fooled by a "This Old House" type show where they
>> use a high-tech sounding buzzword to impress people who don't know any
>> better.
>> 
>> Just answer one question, if you can.  If it's really geothermal, why
>> is the temperature only 51 degrees, but in Iceland, where there's real
>> geothermal, they're accessing temperatures of hundreds of degrees?

>Physics failure does not know that geothermal comes from Earth interior, 
>and has a gradient, so as it approaches the crust, it tapers off to 51 F.

Yes it is a gradient, which has decreased to essentially zero at that
rather shallow depth, since the temperature is quite cool, about the
average of summer and winter temperatures.

>Failures of physics cannot think in terms of science, but only spew out
>what they read in a magazine.

You really shouldn't talk about yourself that way.

>Creeps like Plutonium do not belong in sci.physics as posters, only as 
>readers to learn, but AP is so dumb that he cannot help himself in 
>posting and proving he is an ignorant.

There. I fixed your post for you.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Iceland leading the world in energy while USA goes with dirty coal//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 21:59 -0800
  Iceland leading the world in energy while USA goes with dirty coal//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 13:56 -0800
    Re: Iceland leading the world in energy while USA goes with dirty coal//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 18:39 -0800
    Science Council that rules the World//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 23:25 -0800
      Re: Science Council that rules the World//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 13:22 -0800
        Re: Science Council that rules the World to 1 "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-16 13:41 -0800
      Science Council that rules the World//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 16:05 -0800
        Re: Science Council that rules the World// Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 20:14 -0800
          Re: Science Council that rules the World// Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-17 18:33 -0800
            Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydrothermal 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-17 23:27 -0800
              Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydrothermal 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-18 18:38 -0800
                Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-19 19:35 -0800
                Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 19:52 -0800
                Iceland should win the Nobel prize in physics for leading the world to geothermal Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 22:45 -0800
                Re: Iceland should win the Nobel prize in physics for leading the world to geothermal Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 13:02 -0800
                Re: Iceland should win the Nobel prize in physics for leading the world to geothermal Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-23 13:15 -0800
                Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-23 16:40 +0000
                How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 13:39 -0800
                Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 17:36 -0800
                Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-24 02:44 +0000
                Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 18:57 -0800
                Re: How dumb and stupid is Archimedes Plutonium in physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-24 21:39 +0000
                Re: How dumb and stupid is Archimedes Plutonium in physics? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 19:08 -0800
                Re: How dumb and stupid is Archimedes Plutonium in physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-25 05:55 +0000
                Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 09:23 -0800

csiph-web