Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #610337
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: How dumb and stupid is Archimedes Plutonium in physics? |
| Date | 2016-12-25 05:55 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <o3nn13$rgh$3@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <bcea587c-e5a4-4bc6-a52d-7abc9d224ba3@googlegroups.com> <o3kndo$76s$1@pcls7.std.com> <6f84761d-20c4-45c1-b5ae-452ba2b6f131@googlegroups.com> <o3mpv8$k3a$1@pcls7.std.com> <412cdb7e-203d-458d-bdf3-63a0ce8b4117@googlegroups.com> |
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes: >On Saturday, December 24, 2016 at 3:39:56 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: >> Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes: >> >> >> Yes it is a gradient, which has decreased to essentially zero at that >> rather shallow depth, since the temperature is quite cool, about the >> average of summer and winter temperatures. >> >Physics failure never was in a mine, underground before with its >gradient temperature. You were never in a mine, Archie? I've been in caves, one is a constant 52 F year round, and the explanation FROM A GEOLOGIST is it's that temperature because that's the average temperature of the climate in the area (NY State) but the insulation of the ground is sufficient such that there is very little change between winter and summer in the cave.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Iceland leading the world in energy while USA goes with dirty coal//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 21:59 -0800
Iceland leading the world in energy while USA goes with dirty coal//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 13:56 -0800
Re: Iceland leading the world in energy while USA goes with dirty coal//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 18:39 -0800
Science Council that rules the World//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 23:25 -0800
Re: Science Council that rules the World//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 13:22 -0800
Re: Science Council that rules the World to 1 "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-16 13:41 -0800
Science Council that rules the World//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 16:05 -0800
Re: Science Council that rules the World// Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 20:14 -0800
Re: Science Council that rules the World// Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-17 18:33 -0800
Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydrothermal 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-17 23:27 -0800
Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydrothermal 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-18 18:38 -0800
Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-19 19:35 -0800
Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 19:52 -0800
Iceland should win the Nobel prize in physics for leading the world to geothermal Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 22:45 -0800
Re: Iceland should win the Nobel prize in physics for leading the world to geothermal Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 13:02 -0800
Re: Iceland should win the Nobel prize in physics for leading the world to geothermal Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-23 13:15 -0800
Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-23 16:40 +0000
How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 13:39 -0800
Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 17:36 -0800
Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-24 02:44 +0000
Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 18:57 -0800
Re: How dumb and stupid is Archimedes Plutonium in physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-24 21:39 +0000
Re: How dumb and stupid is Archimedes Plutonium in physics? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 19:08 -0800
Re: How dumb and stupid is Archimedes Plutonium in physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-25 05:55 +0000
Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 09:23 -0800
csiph-web