Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #610251
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? |
| Date | 2016-12-24 02:44 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <o3kndo$76s$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <0b4c6ae3-4d60-4e79-aafc-01670346a564@googlegroups.com> <5c43b2c6-20b6-49ec-adfa-76765b7e25e3@googlegroups.com> <5fa1a400-c4e1-43c2-8e94-826c6c53661d@googlegroups.com> <o3jk15$v4p$3@pcls7.std.com> <bcea587c-e5a4-4bc6-a52d-7abc9d224ba3@googlegroups.com> |
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes: <snip crap> So all you have is insults, no actual science? Typical for you. Admit it, you were fooled by a "This Old House" type show where they use a high-tech sounding buzzword to impress people who don't know any better. Just answer one question, if you can. If it's really geothermal, why is the temperature only 51 degrees, but in Iceland, where there's real geothermal, they're accessing temperatures of hundreds of degrees?
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Iceland leading the world in energy while USA goes with dirty coal//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 21:59 -0800
Iceland leading the world in energy while USA goes with dirty coal//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 13:56 -0800
Re: Iceland leading the world in energy while USA goes with dirty coal//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 18:39 -0800
Science Council that rules the World//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 23:25 -0800
Re: Science Council that rules the World//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 13:22 -0800
Re: Science Council that rules the World to 1 "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-16 13:41 -0800
Science Council that rules the World//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 16:05 -0800
Re: Science Council that rules the World// Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 20:14 -0800
Re: Science Council that rules the World// Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-17 18:33 -0800
Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydrothermal 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-17 23:27 -0800
Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydrothermal 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-18 18:38 -0800
Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-19 19:35 -0800
Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 19:52 -0800
Iceland should win the Nobel prize in physics for leading the world to geothermal Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 22:45 -0800
Re: Iceland should win the Nobel prize in physics for leading the world to geothermal Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 13:02 -0800
Re: Iceland should win the Nobel prize in physics for leading the world to geothermal Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-23 13:15 -0800
Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-23 16:40 +0000
How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 13:39 -0800
Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 17:36 -0800
Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-24 02:44 +0000
Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 18:57 -0800
Re: How dumb and stupid is Archimedes Plutonium in physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-24 21:39 +0000
Re: How dumb and stupid is Archimedes Plutonium in physics? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 19:08 -0800
Re: How dumb and stupid is Archimedes Plutonium in physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-25 05:55 +0000
Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 09:23 -0800
csiph-web