Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #610251

Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics?

From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics?
Date 2016-12-24 02:44 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <o3kndo$76s$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <0b4c6ae3-4d60-4e79-aafc-01670346a564@googlegroups.com> <5c43b2c6-20b6-49ec-adfa-76765b7e25e3@googlegroups.com> <5fa1a400-c4e1-43c2-8e94-826c6c53661d@googlegroups.com> <o3jk15$v4p$3@pcls7.std.com> <bcea587c-e5a4-4bc6-a52d-7abc9d224ba3@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

<snip crap>

So all you have is insults, no actual science?  Typical for you.

Admit it, you were fooled by a "This Old House" type show where they
use a high-tech sounding buzzword to impress people who don't know any
better.

Just answer one question, if you can.  If it's really geothermal, why
is the temperature only 51 degrees, but in Iceland, where there's real
geothermal, they're accessing temperatures of hundreds of degrees?

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Iceland leading the world in energy while USA goes with dirty coal//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-14 21:59 -0800
  Iceland leading the world in energy while USA goes with dirty coal//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 13:56 -0800
    Re: Iceland leading the world in energy while USA goes with dirty coal//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 18:39 -0800
    Science Council that rules the World//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 23:25 -0800
      Re: Science Council that rules the World//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 13:22 -0800
        Re: Science Council that rules the World to 1 "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-16 13:41 -0800
      Science Council that rules the World//Stefan Boltzmann law: Geothermal, is it 4 to 1 superior to Solar or 5000 to 1 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 16:05 -0800
        Re: Science Council that rules the World// Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 20:14 -0800
          Re: Science Council that rules the World// Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-17 18:33 -0800
            Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydrothermal 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-17 23:27 -0800
              Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydrothermal 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-18 18:38 -0800
                Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-19 19:35 -0800
                Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 19:52 -0800
                Iceland should win the Nobel prize in physics for leading the world to geothermal Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 22:45 -0800
                Re: Iceland should win the Nobel prize in physics for leading the world to geothermal Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 13:02 -0800
                Re: Iceland should win the Nobel prize in physics for leading the world to geothermal Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-23 13:15 -0800
                Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-23 16:40 +0000
                How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 13:39 -0800
                Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 17:36 -0800
                Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-24 02:44 +0000
                Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 18:57 -0800
                Re: How dumb and stupid is Archimedes Plutonium in physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-24 21:39 +0000
                Re: How dumb and stupid is Archimedes Plutonium in physics? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 19:08 -0800
                Re: How dumb and stupid is Archimedes Plutonium in physics? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-25 05:55 +0000
                Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 09:23 -0800

csiph-web