Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #591033

Re: Gravity and light question

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/27/2016 5:15 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Odd Bodkin wrote:
>
>> On 7/27/2016 11:36 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>> So will you please stop making your “web designer” (I am not one, I work
>>> as a *software* *developer* with expertise in Web _development_) “and
>>> Star Trek fanboy” (I am not one, I am a Star Trek follower) argument?
>>> Not only is it fallacious, it is getting old.  TIA.
>>>
>>>> […] As far as I'm concerned, your credentials and right to claim level
>>>> [of understanding are no better than mine.
>>>
>>> Well, I did not claim anything.  However, there is more professional
>>> physics in my life than you know.  I would gladly tell you the details,
>>> but unfortunately you have shown that you cannot be trusted.
>>
>> Trusted with what?
>
> Personal information.

Which YOU have exposed PUBLICLY. So why would you expect this 
information to be held closely in a trust basis?

>
>> I've presented nothing other than what you have presented YOURSELF.
>
> You really need it spelt out for you?  OK.  You have showed that you cannot
> be trusted _not_ to misuse personal information to try (and fail, see above;
> but that is beside the point) to gain an advantage.

I'll repeat something you apparently did not read or did not retain. I 
am not claiming advantage. I am disclaiming DISadvantage.


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Gravity and light question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-26 21:36 +0200
  Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 15:05 -0500
    Re: Gravity and light question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-27 18:36 +0200
      Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 13:08 -0500
        Re: Gravity and light question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-28 00:15 +0200
          Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 09:24 -0500
            Re: Gravity and light question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-29 07:05 +0200
  i.q at most zero noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 14:19 -0700
    Light (was: i.q at most zero) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-29 07:16 +0200
      Re: Light (was: i.q at most zero) LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 22:34 -0700
        see _Light, a history: Fermat's complete correspondence on light_ noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 09:38 -0700
          Re: see _Light, a history: Fermat's complete correspondence on light_ brandonahenley9@gmail.com - 2016-07-29 12:38 -0700

csiph-web