Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #590849

Re: Gravity and light question

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Gravity and light question
Date 2016-07-26 15:05 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <nn8fp6$1h9k$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <e8ea96b9-5f35-4a2c-b418-82a20294c87f@googlegroups.com> <95a5f592-3ac0-45ae-9a16-41518bfe2acc@googlegroups.com> <17055a16-5dc4-4388-a6ff-bdafc6cf7dfa@googlegroups.com> <nmj46o$c9o$1@gioia.aioe.org> <4688578.Sb9uPGUboI@PointedEars.de>

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/26/2016 2:36 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Given your history, you should not presume that you know what physicists
> mean by anything, or everything, either.  Reading a lot of books is not
> equivalent to understanding what they are about.

Maybe, but the more I read, the more I learn, and the more I discover 
that my understanding to that point is validated. That's what learning 
means.

As for you lecturing me about not knowing what physicists mean by 
anything, I would caution any web designer and Star Trek fanboy not to 
get too uppity about making the same claim. As far as I'm concerned, 
your credentials and right to claim level of understanding are no better 
than mine.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Gravity and light question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-26 21:36 +0200
  Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 15:05 -0500
    Re: Gravity and light question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-27 18:36 +0200
      Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 13:08 -0500
        Re: Gravity and light question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-28 00:15 +0200
          Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 09:24 -0500
            Re: Gravity and light question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-29 07:05 +0200
  i.q at most zero noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 14:19 -0700
    Light (was: i.q at most zero) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-29 07:16 +0200
      Re: Light (was: i.q at most zero) LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 22:34 -0700
        see _Light, a history: Fermat's complete correspondence on light_ noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 09:38 -0700
          Re: see _Light, a history: Fermat's complete correspondence on light_ brandonahenley9@gmail.com - 2016-07-29 12:38 -0700

csiph-web