Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #590989

Re: Gravity and light question

From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Gravity and light question
Date 2016-07-28 00:15 +0200
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID <1873390.irdbgypaU6@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <nmj46o$c9o$1@gioia.aioe.org> <4688578.Sb9uPGUboI@PointedEars.de> <nn8fp6$1h9k$1@gioia.aioe.org> <4216963.31r3eYUQgx@PointedEars.de> <nnatbo$13k0$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Odd Bodkin wrote:

> On 7/27/2016 11:36 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> So will you please stop making your “web designer” (I am not one, I work
>> as a *software* *developer* with expertise in Web _development_) “and
>> Star Trek fanboy” (I am not one, I am a Star Trek follower) argument? 
>> Not only is it fallacious, it is getting old.  TIA.
>>
>>> […] As far as I'm concerned, your credentials and right to claim level
>>> [of understanding are no better than mine.
>>
>> Well, I did not claim anything.  However, there is more professional
>> physics in my life than you know.  I would gladly tell you the details,
>> but unfortunately you have shown that you cannot be trusted.
> 
> Trusted with what?

Personal information.

> I've presented nothing other than what you have presented YOURSELF.

You really need it spelt out for you?  OK.  You have showed that you cannot 
be trusted _not_ to misuse personal information to try (and fail, see above; 
but that is beside the point) to gain an advantage.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Gravity and light question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-26 21:36 +0200
  Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 15:05 -0500
    Re: Gravity and light question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-27 18:36 +0200
      Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 13:08 -0500
        Re: Gravity and light question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-28 00:15 +0200
          Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 09:24 -0500
            Re: Gravity and light question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-29 07:05 +0200
  i.q at most zero noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 14:19 -0700
    Light (was: i.q at most zero) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-29 07:16 +0200
      Re: Light (was: i.q at most zero) LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 22:34 -0700
        see _Light, a history: Fermat's complete correspondence on light_ noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 09:38 -0700
          Re: see _Light, a history: Fermat's complete correspondence on light_ brandonahenley9@gmail.com - 2016-07-29 12:38 -0700

csiph-web