Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused

From	"Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused
Date	2016-03-29 20:02 +0200
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<ndefp2$35q$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <nd5oi6$6gu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <98xJy.99091$532.6844@fx15.iad> <dlp0u3F3897U1@mid.individual.net> <dlrlpiFnfibU1@mid.individual.net> <dltfggF792sU1@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 28.03.2016 21:37, Thomas Heger wrote:
> Am 28.03.2016 05:12, schrieb Thomas Heger:
>
>
> This picture is REALLY strange:
>
> https://d1o50x50snmhul.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/dn17488-1_500.jpg
>
>
> To understand the situation one should notice, that these dolls in the
> background are actually representations of the guys standing in front of
> the lander.
>
> Now the problem:
> the lander is 'real', as are the astronauts. But the dolls are smaller
> than the real astronauts.
>
>
>
> Here is a picture from a training for Apollo 11 on Earth:
>
> http://c7.alamy.com/comp/F4T3D3/training-astronaut-neil-armstrong-in-the-apollo-11-houston-tx-usa-F4T3D3.jpg
>
>
> Here a picture of Buzz Aldrin:
>
> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9c/Aldrin_Apollo_11.jpg/600px-Aldrin_Apollo_11.jpg
>
>
> Now the head is larger and the legs are shorter in the second picture.
> This means, the picture was made from slightly above - but only the
> picture of the astronaut, not the ground.
>
> The ground was photographed from a very low position, since the pads of
> the lander are relatively large (hence the camera was close to them).
>
>
>
> TH
>
>

Quite funny!
Pretending to think that normal perspective phenomena
in photographs are sign of fraud!

I bet there are several cranks that will buy it! :-D

http://tinyurl.com/hhlab9o
The real people on the right are smaller than the dolls!
An obvious fraud! :-D

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/

Thread

Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 20:11 -0700
  Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 07:30 +0100
    Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 05:10 -0700
      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 10:25 +0100
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Bojana Kudryavtseva <bojkud@rtyn56h67i.org> - 2016-03-26 10:33 +0000
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 10:36 -0400
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-27 05:04 +0200
              Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-28 05:12 +0200
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-28 21:37 +0200
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Ewan <iq49j@noemail.edu> - 2016-03-28 19:52 +0000
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-30 06:38 +0200
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-29 20:02 +0200
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:04 -0700
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 17:13 +0100
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:36 -0700
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 23:54 -0700
      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 11:39 +0100
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:10 -0700
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 14:02 -0700
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-29 18:49 -0500
  Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-25 18:20 +0000
    Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 13:04 -0700
      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-26 18:05 +0000
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 11:19 -0700
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-27 05:09 +0000

csiph-web