Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #566260

Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Am 28.03.2016 05:12, schrieb Thomas Heger:

>>>> Men never went to the moon and probably never will.
>>>> - Big Willy
>>>>
>>> Of course they did! Faked TV moon landing doesn't mean nobody ever went
>>> there! Trust me.
>>
>> The purpose of media-fakery is to create a state of uneasiness called
>> 'cognitive dissonance' in the general public.
>>
>> People know subconciously, they are lied at, but are not able to accept
>> this. This creates the desired stress in the mind, which is utilised for
>> mass-manipulation.
>>
>> So people are told stuff, what their subconcious mind regards as fake,
>> but their concious mind as truth. This state demands 'relief', and let
>> make people follow any idiot, who promises to 'free' them.
>>
>> (It also promotes the use of drugs, btw.)
>>
>> So the pictures are more blurry than necessary, since people SHALL see
>> the fraud. That is an essential part of the plan and a necessity for
>> mass-manipulation.
>
> Example:
> this is an iconic photo.
>
> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Aldrin_Apollo_11.jpg
>
> What you actually see is a large disproportion between head (helmet) and
> legs.
>
> Human bodies have a certain canon of relations, which e.g. Leonardo da
> Vinci depicted here:
>
> http://www.art-leonardo-da-vinci.de/images/leonardo-da-vinci-vitruvianische-mensch.jpg
>
>
> Now too large head and to short legs give the impression of 'cuteness':
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuteness
>
> Which is something, the subconscious mind recognises, but what does not
> fit to scientific experiments on the Moon.
>
> So we have a carefully designed image, that clearly attempts to bring
> the viewer into the confused state called 'cognitive dissonance'.
>

This picture is REALLY strange:

https://d1o50x50snmhul.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/dn17488-1_500.jpg

To understand the situation one should notice, that these dolls in the 
background are actually representations of the guys standing in front of 
the lander.

Now the problem:
the lander is 'real', as are the astronauts. But the dolls are smaller 
than the real astronauts.



Here is a picture from a training for Apollo 11 on Earth:

http://c7.alamy.com/comp/F4T3D3/training-astronaut-neil-armstrong-in-the-apollo-11-houston-tx-usa-F4T3D3.jpg

Here a picture of Buzz Aldrin:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9c/Aldrin_Apollo_11.jpg/600px-Aldrin_Apollo_11.jpg

Now the head is larger and the legs are shorter in the second picture. 
This means, the picture was made from slightly above - but only the 
picture of the astronaut, not the ground.

The ground was photographed from a very low position, since the pads of 
the lander are relatively large (hence the camera was close to them).



TH

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 20:11 -0700
  Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 07:30 +0100
    Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 05:10 -0700
      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 10:25 +0100
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Bojana Kudryavtseva <bojkud@rtyn56h67i.org> - 2016-03-26 10:33 +0000
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 10:36 -0400
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-27 05:04 +0200
              Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-28 05:12 +0200
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-28 21:37 +0200
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Ewan <iq49j@noemail.edu> - 2016-03-28 19:52 +0000
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-30 06:38 +0200
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-29 20:02 +0200
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:04 -0700
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 17:13 +0100
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:36 -0700
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 23:54 -0700
      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 11:39 +0100
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:10 -0700
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 14:02 -0700
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-29 18:49 -0500
  Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-25 18:20 +0000
    Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 13:04 -0700
      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-26 18:05 +0000
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 11:19 -0700
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-27 05:09 +0000

csiph-web