Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused

From	Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused
Date	2016-03-27 05:04 +0200
Message-ID	<dlp0u3F3897U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <nd2lnf$bpl$1@dont-email.me> <e91ae499-fa03-4bee-b115-57b69d6090e4@googlegroups.com> <nd5kc6$ar2$1@dont-email.me> <nd5oi6$6gu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <98xJy.99091$532.6844@fx15.iad>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Am 26.03.2016 15:36, schrieb benj:

>>>>> Liquid or supercritical CO2 is used as a polar solvent, e.g. for
>>>>> extraction of polar caffeine from coffee.
>>>>
>>>> Interesting.
>>>>
>>> And illustrating your statement about meaningless is not relevant.
>>> Being polar means either to have atoms with partial charges, either to
>>> be donor or acceptor of electron pair.
>>
>> Men never went to the moon and probably never will.
>> - Big Willy
>>
> Of course they did! Faked TV moon landing doesn't mean nobody ever went
> there! Trust me.

The purpose of media-fakery is to create a state of uneasiness called 
'cognitive dissonance' in the general public.

People know subconciously, they are lied at, but are not able to accept 
this. This creates the desired stress in the mind, which is utilised for 
mass-manipulation.

So people are told stuff, what their subconcious mind regards as fake, 
but their concious mind as truth. This state demands 'relief', and let 
make people follow any idiot, who promises to 'free' them.

(It also promotes the use of drugs, btw.)

So the pictures are more blurry than necessary, since people SHALL see 
the fraud. That is an essential part of the plan and a necessity for 
mass-manipulation.


TH

Thread

Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 20:11 -0700
  Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 07:30 +0100
    Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 05:10 -0700
      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 10:25 +0100
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Bojana Kudryavtseva <bojkud@rtyn56h67i.org> - 2016-03-26 10:33 +0000
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 10:36 -0400
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-27 05:04 +0200
              Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-28 05:12 +0200
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-28 21:37 +0200
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Ewan <iq49j@noemail.edu> - 2016-03-28 19:52 +0000
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-30 06:38 +0200
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-29 20:02 +0200
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:04 -0700
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 17:13 +0100
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:36 -0700
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 23:54 -0700
      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 11:39 +0100
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:10 -0700
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 14:02 -0700
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-29 18:49 -0500
  Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-25 18:20 +0000
    Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 13:04 -0700
      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-26 18:05 +0000
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 11:19 -0700
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-27 05:09 +0000

csiph-web