Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #566054

Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Am 27.03.2016 05:04, schrieb Thomas Heger:
> Am 26.03.2016 15:36, schrieb benj:
>
>>>>>> Liquid or supercritical CO2 is used as a polar solvent, e.g. for
>>>>>> extraction of polar caffeine from coffee.
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting.
>>>>>
>>>> And illustrating your statement about meaningless is not relevant.
>>>> Being polar means either to have atoms with partial charges, either to
>>>> be donor or acceptor of electron pair.
>>>
>>> Men never went to the moon and probably never will.
>>> - Big Willy
>>>
>> Of course they did! Faked TV moon landing doesn't mean nobody ever went
>> there! Trust me.
>
> The purpose of media-fakery is to create a state of uneasiness called
> 'cognitive dissonance' in the general public.
>
> People know subconciously, they are lied at, but are not able to accept
> this. This creates the desired stress in the mind, which is utilised for
> mass-manipulation.
>
> So people are told stuff, what their subconcious mind regards as fake,
> but their concious mind as truth. This state demands 'relief', and let
> make people follow any idiot, who promises to 'free' them.
>
> (It also promotes the use of drugs, btw.)
>
> So the pictures are more blurry than necessary, since people SHALL see
> the fraud. That is an essential part of the plan and a necessity for
> mass-manipulation.

Example:
this is an iconic photo.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Aldrin_Apollo_11.jpg

What you actually see is a large disproportion between head (helmet) and 
legs.

Human bodies have a certain canon of relations, which e.g. Leonardo da 
Vinci depicted here:

http://www.art-leonardo-da-vinci.de/images/leonardo-da-vinci-vitruvianische-mensch.jpg

Now too large head and to short legs give the impression of 'cuteness':

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuteness

Which is something, the subconscious mind recognises, but what does not 
fit to scientific experiments on the Moon.

So we have a carefully designed image, that clearly attempts to bring 
the viewer into the confused state called 'cognitive dissonance'.


TH

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 20:11 -0700
  Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 07:30 +0100
    Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 05:10 -0700
      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 10:25 +0100
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Bojana Kudryavtseva <bojkud@rtyn56h67i.org> - 2016-03-26 10:33 +0000
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 10:36 -0400
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-27 05:04 +0200
              Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-28 05:12 +0200
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-28 21:37 +0200
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Ewan <iq49j@noemail.edu> - 2016-03-28 19:52 +0000
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-30 06:38 +0200
                Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-29 20:02 +0200
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:04 -0700
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 17:13 +0100
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:36 -0700
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 23:54 -0700
      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 11:39 +0100
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:10 -0700
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 14:02 -0700
            Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-29 18:49 -0500
  Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-25 18:20 +0000
    Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 13:04 -0700
      Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-26 18:05 +0000
        Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 11:19 -0700
          Re: Why Water Researchers Are Confused jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-27 05:09 +0000

csiph-web