Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #343773

Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/16/2016 7:47 PM, owl wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> On 2/16/2016 4:47 PM, vallor wrote:
>>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:04:07 -0800, kubuntuking wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 12:22:51 AM UTC+1, Chris Ahlstrom
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Tronald Dump wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>>> royalties:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>>>>> royalties:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
>>>>>>>> <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several
>>>>>>>>> times now and I suggest others try to help support him
>>>>>>>>> because he is clearly being attacked for speaking the
>>>>>>>>> truth. This thread is a prime example of that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is same dizum troll I think...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Congratulations, you failed the test. It was satirical prose
>>>>>> and being weak minded you didn't have the courage to take a
>>>>>> stand, or make a decision and disagree or agree with what I
>>>>>> wrote.
>>>>>
>>>>> Awww, you're makin' me lachrymose that I failed to detect a
>>>>> troll's "satirical prose".
>>>>>
>>>>> So if it is satirical, why do I have to "make a decision" or
>>>>> "disagree or agree" with it, or even "take a stand" about it?
>>>>
>>>> Oh Creepy. Are you still trying to impress people with your
>>>> wonderfully silly  collection of "big words"?
>>>>
>>>> How awfully embarrassing for all concerned.
>>>>
>>>> My God. What a weenie.
>>>
>>> Aaaaand another doofus nymshift goes in the plonk bucket.
>>
>>
>> I don't nymshift, fat man.  I've used only 'DFS' for more than 11 years.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> How to tell it's doofus:
>>
>> Your 3rd chin starts jiggling?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> * Complaints about vocabulary * "weenie"
>>
>>
>> A pretentious weenie
>>
>> amanuensis, animadversion, bastinadoing, batrachian-faced, Boeotian,
>> befoul, bilious, blancmange, caducity, capacious, cavilling, cherish,
>> chrondrane, confabulate, contumely, coprolalia, coprolalic, coprophile,
>> de rigueur, discourse, disputatious, dotage, excrescences,
>> expostulations, feckless, flagitious, fomenters, forfend, fractious,
>> fulsome, gavage, ignominious, ineffable, intromission, jocose, jocosity,
>> kvell, lachrymose, lagniappe, lahar, limn, limned, litotes,
>> logophobia, mendacious, modicum, oeuvre, ordure, outre, paucity,
>> perdition, peremptory, persiflage, perspicacity, pettifogging,
>> philistine, plebeian, polemic, poltroon, poniarding, presbycusis,
>> prevarication, puissance, puissant, pulings, purblind, pustulant,
>> pyroclastic, querulous, ratiocination, remonstrates, rhodomontade,
>> rococo, sallow, Schadenfreude, schlemiel, scurrilous, sesquipedalian,
>> sesquipedalophobia, stercoraceous, stotting, stultiloquence, thews,
>> throng, timorousness, transmuted, tumescent, unctuous, uxoriousness,
>> wankle, Weltanschauung, writs
>>
>
> Hell, "weenie" is even in the Jargon File.
>
> <true story>
>
> Little Beaver, his mom, and his ball go to the playground...
>
> Little Beaver:  "Hey you guys, Mom made some frankfurters!"
> Chorus: "Get lost, douchebag."
>
> </true story>


It happened when he was 35 years old...

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Roy Schestowitz Makes The List Of Internet Kooks. Marly Parlorr <lingdingfwah@teachers.org> - 2016-02-13 16:35 +0000
  More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 13:22 -0500
    Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 18:36 +0000
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-13 19:45 +0100
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 14:09 -0500
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-13 20:50 +0100
            Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:10 +0000
              Boom -- another creep in the sin bin (and Score.shar) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-13 22:44 +0000
                Re: Boom -- another creep in the sin bin (and Score.shar) Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:53 +0000
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:14 +0000
            Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 18:19 -0500
              Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz kubuntuking@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 06:04 -0800
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-15 09:54 -0500
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-16 21:47 +0000
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:32 +0000
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-16 19:41 -0500
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:47 +0000
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-16 20:02 -0500
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-17 09:41 -0500
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-16 21:24 -0500
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-17 02:33 +0000
              Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:26 +0000
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-13 16:50 -0500
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:12 +0000
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 18:21 -0500
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 07:07 -0600
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-14 15:38 +0100
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-14 12:01 -0500
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-14 12:39 -0500
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-14 10:13 -0500
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-14 12:03 -0500
    Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz kubuntuking@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 06:01 -0800
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Delgato" <delgato@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 16:05 +0100
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Mandingo" <mandingo@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 00:39 +0100
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-15 16:07 -0500

csiph-web