Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #343764
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz |
| Date | 2016-02-17 00:26 +0000 |
| Organization | O.W.L. |
| Message-ID | <hgjdi930af.a3@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <n9nt32$56h$1@dont-email.me> <20160213194556.7a8dd538@maxa-pc> <n9nv1o$dhe$1@dont-email.me> <n9o9rv$qji$3@dont-email.me> <n9odmp$bn7$1@dont-email.me> |
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > Tronald Dump wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> >>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump >>>> <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times now >>>>> and I suggest others try to help support him because he is clearly >>>>> being attacked for speaking the truth. >>>>> This thread is a prime example of that. >>>> >>>> This is same dizum troll I think... >>> >>> Could be. Play both sides and git yer giggles either way. >> >> Congratulations, you failed the test. >> It was satirical prose and being weak minded you didn't have the courage >> to take a stand, or make a decision and disagree or agree with what I >> wrote. > > Awww, you're makin' me lachrymose that I failed to detect > a troll's "satirical prose". > > So if it is satirical, why do I have to "make a decision" or "disagree or > agree" with it, or even "take a stand" about it? > > You sound like Flounder or the Dizum Dipshit, which does not redound to > your credit, I would aver! Hold your tongue, impious fish! > > In any case, your protestations notwithstanding, it is my considered > conviction that I actually passed a detection test, albeit not the > test that you assert. In the future, you should be cognizant of the > stipulation that any post that discusses Roy is likely to be dismissed out > of hand as the artifact of a feckless troll. > douchebag
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Roy Schestowitz Makes The List Of Internet Kooks. Marly Parlorr <lingdingfwah@teachers.org> - 2016-02-13 16:35 +0000
More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 13:22 -0500
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 18:36 +0000
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-13 19:45 +0100
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 14:09 -0500
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-13 20:50 +0100
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:10 +0000
Boom -- another creep in the sin bin (and Score.shar) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-13 22:44 +0000
Re: Boom -- another creep in the sin bin (and Score.shar) Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:53 +0000
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:14 +0000
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 18:19 -0500
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz kubuntuking@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 06:04 -0800
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-15 09:54 -0500
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-16 21:47 +0000
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:32 +0000
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-16 19:41 -0500
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:47 +0000
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-16 20:02 -0500
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-17 09:41 -0500
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-16 21:24 -0500
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-17 02:33 +0000
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:26 +0000
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-13 16:50 -0500
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:12 +0000
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 18:21 -0500
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 07:07 -0600
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-14 15:38 +0100
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-14 12:01 -0500
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-14 12:39 -0500
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-14 10:13 -0500
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-14 12:03 -0500
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz kubuntuking@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 06:01 -0800
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Delgato" <delgato@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 16:05 +0100
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Mandingo" <mandingo@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 00:39 +0100
Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-15 16:07 -0500
csiph-web