Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #343769

Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz
Date	2016-02-17 00:47 +0000
Organization	O.W.L.
Message-ID	<hjgod03.ap103@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <n9o9rv$qji$3@dont-email.me> <n9odmp$bn7$1@dont-email.me> <9a38032e-36c2-4c84-a120-82922234344a@googlegroups.com> <dihjn1F16jnU1@mid.individual.net> <na0ff0$8ob$4@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 2/16/2016 4:47 PM, vallor wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:04:07 -0800, kubuntuking wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 12:22:51 AM UTC+1, Chris Ahlstrom
>>> wrote:
>>>> Tronald Dump wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>> royalties:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>>>> royalties:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
>>>>>>> <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several
>>>>>>>> times now and I suggest others try to help support him
>>>>>>>> because he is clearly being attacked for speaking the
>>>>>>>> truth. This thread is a prime example of that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is same dizum troll I think...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
>>>>>
>>>>> Congratulations, you failed the test. It was satirical prose
>>>>> and being weak minded you didn't have the courage to take a
>>>>> stand, or make a decision and disagree or agree with what I
>>>>> wrote.
>>>>
>>>> Awww, you're makin' me lachrymose that I failed to detect a
>>>> troll's "satirical prose".
>>>>
>>>> So if it is satirical, why do I have to "make a decision" or
>>>> "disagree or agree" with it, or even "take a stand" about it?
>>>
>>> Oh Creepy. Are you still trying to impress people with your
>>> wonderfully silly  collection of "big words"?
>>>
>>> How awfully embarrassing for all concerned.
>>>
>>> My God. What a weenie.
>>
>> Aaaaand another doofus nymshift goes in the plonk bucket.
> 
> 
> I don't nymshift, fat man.  I've used only 'DFS' for more than 11 years.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> How to tell it's doofus:
> 
> Your 3rd chin starts jiggling?
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> * Complaints about vocabulary * "weenie"
> 
> 
> A pretentious weenie
> 
> amanuensis, animadversion, bastinadoing, batrachian-faced, Boeotian,
> befoul, bilious, blancmange, caducity, capacious, cavilling, cherish,
> chrondrane, confabulate, contumely, coprolalia, coprolalic, coprophile,
> de rigueur, discourse, disputatious, dotage, excrescences,
> expostulations, feckless, flagitious, fomenters, forfend, fractious,
> fulsome, gavage, ignominious, ineffable, intromission, jocose, jocosity,
> kvell, lachrymose, lagniappe, lahar, limn, limned, litotes,
> logophobia, mendacious, modicum, oeuvre, ordure, outre, paucity,
> perdition, peremptory, persiflage, perspicacity, pettifogging,
> philistine, plebeian, polemic, poltroon, poniarding, presbycusis,
> prevarication, puissance, puissant, pulings, purblind, pustulant,
> pyroclastic, querulous, ratiocination, remonstrates, rhodomontade,
> rococo, sallow, Schadenfreude, schlemiel, scurrilous, sesquipedalian,
> sesquipedalophobia, stercoraceous, stotting, stultiloquence, thews,
> throng, timorousness, transmuted, tumescent, unctuous, uxoriousness,
> wankle, Weltanschauung, writs
> 

Hell, "weenie" is even in the Jargon File.

<true story>

Little Beaver, his mom, and his ball go to the playground...

Little Beaver:  "Hey you guys, Mom made some frankfurters!"
Chorus: "Get lost, douchebag."

</true story>

Thread

Roy Schestowitz Makes The List Of Internet Kooks. Marly Parlorr <lingdingfwah@teachers.org> - 2016-02-13 16:35 +0000
  More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 13:22 -0500
    Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 18:36 +0000
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-13 19:45 +0100
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 14:09 -0500
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-13 20:50 +0100
            Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:10 +0000
              Boom -- another creep in the sin bin (and Score.shar) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-13 22:44 +0000
                Re: Boom -- another creep in the sin bin (and Score.shar) Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:53 +0000
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:14 +0000
            Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 18:19 -0500
              Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz kubuntuking@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 06:04 -0800
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-15 09:54 -0500
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-16 21:47 +0000
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:32 +0000
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-16 19:41 -0500
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:47 +0000
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-16 20:02 -0500
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-17 09:41 -0500
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-16 21:24 -0500
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-17 02:33 +0000
              Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:26 +0000
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-13 16:50 -0500
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:12 +0000
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 18:21 -0500
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 07:07 -0600
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-14 15:38 +0100
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-14 12:01 -0500
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-14 12:39 -0500
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-14 10:13 -0500
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-14 12:03 -0500
    Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz kubuntuking@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 06:01 -0800
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Delgato" <delgato@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 16:05 +0100
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Mandingo" <mandingo@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 00:39 +0100
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-15 16:07 -0500

csiph-web