Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #343767

Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

From	DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz
Date	2016-02-16 19:41 -0500
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<na0ff0$8ob$4@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <n9nv1o$dhe$1@dont-email.me> <n9o9rv$qji$3@dont-email.me> <n9odmp$bn7$1@dont-email.me> <9a38032e-36c2-4c84-a120-82922234344a@googlegroups.com> <dihjn1F16jnU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/16/2016 4:47 PM, vallor wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:04:07 -0800, kubuntuking wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 12:22:51 AM UTC+1, Chris Ahlstrom
>> wrote:
>>> Tronald Dump wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>> royalties:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>>> royalties:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
>>>>>> <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several
>>>>>>> times now and I suggest others try to help support him
>>>>>>> because he is clearly being attacked for speaking the
>>>>>>> truth. This thread is a prime example of that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is same dizum troll I think...
>>>>>
>>>>> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
>>>>
>>>> Congratulations, you failed the test. It was satirical prose
>>>> and being weak minded you didn't have the courage to take a
>>>> stand, or make a decision and disagree or agree with what I
>>>> wrote.
>>>
>>> Awww, you're makin' me lachrymose that I failed to detect a
>>> troll's "satirical prose".
>>>
>>> So if it is satirical, why do I have to "make a decision" or
>>> "disagree or agree" with it, or even "take a stand" about it?
>>
>> Oh Creepy. Are you still trying to impress people with your
>> wonderfully silly  collection of "big words"?
>>
>> How awfully embarrassing for all concerned.
>>
>> My God. What a weenie.
>
> Aaaaand another doofus nymshift goes in the plonk bucket.


I don't nymshift, fat man.  I've used only 'DFS' for more than 11 years.




> How to tell it's doofus:

Your 3rd chin starts jiggling?




> * Complaints about vocabulary * "weenie"


A pretentious weenie

amanuensis, animadversion, bastinadoing, batrachian-faced, Boeotian,
befoul, bilious, blancmange, caducity, capacious, cavilling, cherish,
chrondrane, confabulate, contumely, coprolalia, coprolalic, coprophile,
de rigueur, discourse, disputatious, dotage, excrescences,
expostulations, feckless, flagitious, fomenters, forfend, fractious,
fulsome, gavage, ignominious, ineffable, intromission, jocose, jocosity,
kvell, lachrymose, lagniappe, lahar, limn, limned, litotes,
logophobia, mendacious, modicum, oeuvre, ordure, outre, paucity,
perdition, peremptory, persiflage, perspicacity, pettifogging,
philistine, plebeian, polemic, poltroon, poniarding, presbycusis,
prevarication, puissance, puissant, pulings, purblind, pustulant,
pyroclastic, querulous, ratiocination, remonstrates, rhodomontade,
rococo, sallow, Schadenfreude, schlemiel, scurrilous, sesquipedalian,
sesquipedalophobia, stercoraceous, stotting, stultiloquence, thews,
throng, timorousness, transmuted, tumescent, unctuous, uxoriousness,
wankle, Weltanschauung, writs

Thread

Roy Schestowitz Makes The List Of Internet Kooks. Marly Parlorr <lingdingfwah@teachers.org> - 2016-02-13 16:35 +0000
  More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 13:22 -0500
    Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 18:36 +0000
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-13 19:45 +0100
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 14:09 -0500
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-13 20:50 +0100
            Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:10 +0000
              Boom -- another creep in the sin bin (and Score.shar) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-13 22:44 +0000
                Re: Boom -- another creep in the sin bin (and Score.shar) Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:53 +0000
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:14 +0000
            Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 18:19 -0500
              Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz kubuntuking@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 06:04 -0800
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-15 09:54 -0500
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-16 21:47 +0000
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:32 +0000
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-16 19:41 -0500
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:47 +0000
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-16 20:02 -0500
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-17 09:41 -0500
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-16 21:24 -0500
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-17 02:33 +0000
              Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:26 +0000
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-13 16:50 -0500
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:12 +0000
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 18:21 -0500
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 07:07 -0600
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-14 15:38 +0100
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-14 12:01 -0500
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-14 12:39 -0500
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-14 10:13 -0500
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-14 12:03 -0500
    Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz kubuntuking@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 06:01 -0800
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Delgato" <delgato@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 16:05 +0100
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Mandingo" <mandingo@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 00:39 +0100
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-15 16:07 -0500

csiph-web