Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.talk.creationism > #398544
| From | Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.talk.creationism, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy, sci.logic, sci.physics, sci.skeptic |
| Subject | Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. |
| Date | 2015-10-22 23:49 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n0caju$e4e$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <d8qr0pFbfq7U1@mid.individual.net> <8s66ok.fq8.17.1@news.alt.net> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.21{11.47P.Seattle.2015}> <d8rj5jFgptdU1@mid.individual.net> <8s86ss.951.17.1@news.alt.net> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
Le 2015-10-22 16:36, Dale a écrit : > On 10/22/2015 03:56 AM, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 22/10/2015 5:47 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>> "Randomness" is ignorance, nothing more, nothing less. >> >> In the field of quantum mechanics there are good reasons to think that >> the randomness is inherent, and that it is not lack of knowledge that >> prevents us from knowing what will happen and when. >> >> That is, there is no underlying process about which we could in >> principle have knowledge, and thereby be able to look behind the >> randomness. >> >> Since quantum randomness affects the world we perceive, that means that >> at least some of the randomness we see in the world is not just a matter >> of ignorance. >> >> Sylvia. >> > > too often the term random is used > > for instance, is zero-point energy testable? no, you would have to > observe it and introducing yourself or a Casimir apparatus inot the > environment cancels out the zero > > quantum physics went led cosmology into philosophy when there was no > answer to Schroedinger's Cat besides his point, maybe consciousness is a > 5th dimension Eat well. Go to church. Love you family and friends. Leave the rest the fuck alone. -- Olrik aa #1981 EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
Back to alt.talk.creationism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-21 17:47 -0400
Re: rolling dice is not random? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-22 09:45 +1100
Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-21 20:12 -0400
Re: rolling dice is not random? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-22 12:04 +1100
Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-21 22:21 -0400
Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-22 18:56 +1100
Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2015-10-22 03:09 -0700
Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-22 16:36 -0400
Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 23:49 -0400
Re: The Ensemble Interpretation. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-23 11:32 +1100
Re: The Ensemble Interpretation. Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-22 20:40 -0400
Re: The Ensemble Interpretation. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-23 11:50 +1100
Re: Quantum Mechanics is statistical, not real. lucaspa <lucaspa@optonline.net> - 2015-10-24 11:21 -0700
Re: Quantum Mechanics is statistical, not real. lucaspa <lucaspa@optonline.net> - 2015-10-24 11:34 -0700
Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. The BORG <borg@future.com> - 2015-10-24 15:27 +0100
Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. lucaspa <lucaspa@optonline.net> - 2015-10-24 11:13 -0700
Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-25 13:54 +1100
Re: rolling dice is not random? lucaspa <lucaspa@optonline.net> - 2015-10-23 12:04 -0700
Re: rolling dice is not random? lucaspa <lucaspa@optonline.net> - 2015-10-23 12:07 -0700
Re: rolling dice is not random? lucaspa <lucaspa@optonline.net> - 2015-10-23 11:54 -0700
Re: rolling dice is not random? bilgat@m.nu - 2015-10-21 18:46 -0500
Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-21 20:13 -0400
Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-21 22:48 -0400
Re: rolling dice is not random? John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2015-10-22 09:57 +0100
Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-22 16:32 -0400
Re: rolling dice is not random? John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2015-10-22 22:53 +0100
Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-22 19:36 -0400
Re: rolling dice is not random? John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2015-10-23 10:26 +0100
Re: rolling dice is not random? "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@sci.research.careers.i.have.shorter.stature.can.i.grow.taller> - 2015-10-24 09:56 +0000
Re: rolling dice is not random? Hans Wussel <hanswussel@openmailbox.org> - 2015-10-22 19:40 +0200
Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-22 16:38 -0400
Re: rolling dice is not random? lucaspa <lucaspa@optonline.net> - 2015-10-23 11:42 -0700
csiph-web