Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.talk.creationism > #398497
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.talk.creationism, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy, sci.logic, sci.physics, sci.skeptic |
| Subject | Re: rolling dice is not random? |
| Date | 2015-10-22 12:04 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <d8qr0pFbfq7U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <8s5mn9.59b.19.1@news.alt.net> <d8qirfF9n3aU1@mid.individual.net> <8s5v6h.m5l.19.1@news.alt.net> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
On 22/10/2015 11:12 AM, Dale wrote: > On 10/21/2015 06:45 PM, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 22/10/2015 8:47 AM, Dale wrote: >>> assuming determinism means nothing is random, everything is bounded by >>> cause and effect >> >> Probably - but who is assuming determinism? >> >> What point are you actually trying to make here? >> >> Sylvia. > > maybe mutations can't be random Every indication we have is that quantum mechanical processes are random. That leaks into evolution by such processes as: a) Cosmic rays arriving at random and impacting DNA molecules. b) Radioactive decay in the environment and tissues surrounding DNA molecules randomly emitting particles that interact with DNA. c) Radioactive decay within DNA when it happens to contain an unstable isotope of an atom. d) Transcription errors when the wrong chemical reaction occurs because, although it is unlikely, it is not impossible. And who knows how many others. Given the clear evidence that DNA dictates the form of a creature, it's inevitable that these random changes to the DNA will cause mutations, and it's equally inevitable that some of these mutations will be beneficial. To bring God into the picture, you have to have Him either controlling the quantum mechanical processes, or actively removing the beneficial mutations in favour of specific changes He wants. That's a stretch, given that it seems clear that things would happen the way they are even in the absence of His intervention. Sylvia
Back to alt.talk.creationism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-21 17:47 -0400
Re: rolling dice is not random? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-22 09:45 +1100
Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-21 20:12 -0400
Re: rolling dice is not random? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-22 12:04 +1100
Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-21 22:21 -0400
Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-22 18:56 +1100
Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> - 2015-10-22 03:09 -0700
Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-22 16:36 -0400
Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 23:49 -0400
Re: The Ensemble Interpretation. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-23 11:32 +1100
Re: The Ensemble Interpretation. Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-22 20:40 -0400
Re: The Ensemble Interpretation. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-23 11:50 +1100
Re: Quantum Mechanics is statistical, not real. lucaspa <lucaspa@optonline.net> - 2015-10-24 11:21 -0700
Re: Quantum Mechanics is statistical, not real. lucaspa <lucaspa@optonline.net> - 2015-10-24 11:34 -0700
Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. The BORG <borg@future.com> - 2015-10-24 15:27 +0100
Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. lucaspa <lucaspa@optonline.net> - 2015-10-24 11:13 -0700
Re: "Life" is virtual, not real. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-25 13:54 +1100
Re: rolling dice is not random? lucaspa <lucaspa@optonline.net> - 2015-10-23 12:04 -0700
Re: rolling dice is not random? lucaspa <lucaspa@optonline.net> - 2015-10-23 12:07 -0700
Re: rolling dice is not random? lucaspa <lucaspa@optonline.net> - 2015-10-23 11:54 -0700
Re: rolling dice is not random? bilgat@m.nu - 2015-10-21 18:46 -0500
Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-21 20:13 -0400
Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-21 22:48 -0400
Re: rolling dice is not random? John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2015-10-22 09:57 +0100
Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-22 16:32 -0400
Re: rolling dice is not random? John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2015-10-22 22:53 +0100
Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-22 19:36 -0400
Re: rolling dice is not random? John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2015-10-23 10:26 +0100
Re: rolling dice is not random? "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@sci.research.careers.i.have.shorter.stature.can.i.grow.taller> - 2015-10-24 09:56 +0000
Re: rolling dice is not random? Hans Wussel <hanswussel@openmailbox.org> - 2015-10-22 19:40 +0200
Re: rolling dice is not random? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-22 16:38 -0400
Re: rolling dice is not random? lucaspa <lucaspa@optonline.net> - 2015-10-23 11:42 -0700
csiph-web