Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #527235
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron |
| Date | 2015-10-21 22:02 +0200 |
| Organization | Good company |
| Message-ID | <n08qsc$3eo$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <pan.2015.10.21.01.13.12@localhost.localdomain> <n080iv$bpf$1@speranza.aioe.org> <pan.2015.10.21.16.15.27@localhost.localdomain> <n08juu$7ao$1@dont-email.me> <pan.2015.10.21.19.50.20@localhost.localdomain> |
Dne 21/10/2015 v 21:50 Fabian Russell napsal(a): > On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:04:14 +0200, Poutnik wrote: > >>> >>> All things classical should >>> be relegated to the trash heap and given no consideration whatsoever. >>> >> >> Surely you are joking >> > > No. I am dead serious. > > I realize that it is a highly controversial position to take and > as a consequence most would reject it. But it is the most sensible > way to proceed. > > Science education should BEGIN with coordinate systems and coordinate > transformations. This would immediately erect the framework for Minkowski > space and 4-vectors which are the ONLY foundation to physics. Similarly, > quantum concepts should be placed at the very beginning of our understanding > and not presented as a later refinement. > > Newton should share concern with Ptolemy and Aristotle as historical > figures only. > Your approach would be highly contraproductive.... -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
electron-electron vs electron-positron Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-19 10:50 -0500
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-19 09:51 -0700
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron dsr@mail.lns.cornell.edu (Daniel S. Riley) - 2015-10-20 17:12 -0400
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 17:25 -0500
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-21 01:14 +0000
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 07:28 +0200
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-21 05:48 +0000
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 12:27 +0200
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 22:32 -0700
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "Raymond Luxury Yacht" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-10-21 22:23 -0700
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 02:39 -0700
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 02:57 -0700
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 23:04 -0700
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 07:31 -0500
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-21 16:15 +0000
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 20:04 +0200
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-21 19:50 +0000
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 22:02 +0200
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 08:01 +0200
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-22 14:30 +0000
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 16:49 +0200
Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 15:59 -0500
csiph-web