Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron

From	Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron
Date	2015-10-21 20:04 +0200
Organization	Good company
Message-ID	<n08juu$7ao$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<n033fg$j4o$1@speranza.aioe.org> <pan.2015.10.21.01.13.12@localhost.localdomain> <n080iv$bpf$1@speranza.aioe.org> <pan.2015.10.21.16.15.27@localhost.localdomain>

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/21/2015 06:15 PM, Fabian Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:31:29 -0500, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> 
>>
>> Physics theories should be consistent with each other in domains 
>> where they overlap. Here QED says something and classical mechanics says 
>> something, and I'm looking to see if they agree.
>>
> 
> That is a job for the historian of science.  All things classical should
> be relegated to the trash heap and given no consideration whatsoever.
> 

Surely you are joking, Mr. Russell.

If not, than it is a wall to wall running. Stay at the middle.

Every theory and its math model
has its domain of applicability,
if the accuracy is sufficient for the purpose
and if it is simpler to apply than more correct ones.

-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Thread

electron-electron vs electron-positron Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-19 10:50 -0500
  Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-19 09:51 -0700
  Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron dsr@mail.lns.cornell.edu (Daniel S. Riley) - 2015-10-20 17:12 -0400
    Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 17:25 -0500
  Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-21 01:14 +0000
    Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 07:28 +0200
      Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-21 05:48 +0000
        Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 12:27 +0200
    Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 22:32 -0700
      Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "Raymond Luxury Yacht" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-10-21 22:23 -0700
        Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 02:39 -0700
      Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 02:57 -0700
        Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 23:04 -0700
    Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 07:31 -0500
      Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-21 16:15 +0000
        Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 20:04 +0200
          Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-21 19:50 +0000
            Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 22:02 +0200
            Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 08:01 +0200
              Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-22 14:30 +0000
                Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 16:49 +0200
        Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 15:59 -0500

csiph-web