Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron

From	Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron
Date	2015-10-21 16:15 +0000
Organization	NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Message-ID	<pan.2015.10.21.16.15.27@localhost.localdomain> (permalink)
References	<n033fg$j4o$1@speranza.aioe.org> <pan.2015.10.21.01.13.12@localhost.localdomain> <n080iv$bpf$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:31:29 -0500, Odd Bodkin wrote:

> 
> Physics theories should be consistent with each other in domains 
> where they overlap. Here QED says something and classical mechanics says 
> something, and I'm looking to see if they agree.
> 

That is a job for the historian of science.  All things classical should
be relegated to the trash heap and given no consideration whatsoever.

A case in point would be the Raleigh-Jeans Law as an attempt to
explain black-body radiation.  Raleigh-Jeans agrees very accurately
at long wavelengths but, in spite of the overlap, its theoretical
foundation is NOT consistent with modern ideas.  IOW, the Planck Law
is not an extension or modification of Raleigh-Jeans but a completely
different concept.

Now I won't attempt to dictate where your interests should lie, but
you shouldn't be wasting time flogging a dead horse.

Thread

electron-electron vs electron-positron Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-19 10:50 -0500
  Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-19 09:51 -0700
  Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron dsr@mail.lns.cornell.edu (Daniel S. Riley) - 2015-10-20 17:12 -0400
    Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 17:25 -0500
  Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-21 01:14 +0000
    Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 07:28 +0200
      Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-21 05:48 +0000
        Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 12:27 +0200
    Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 22:32 -0700
      Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "Raymond Luxury Yacht" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-10-21 22:23 -0700
        Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 02:39 -0700
      Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 02:57 -0700
        Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 23:04 -0700
    Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 07:31 -0500
      Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-21 16:15 +0000
        Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 20:04 +0200
          Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-21 19:50 +0000
            Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 22:02 +0200
            Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 08:01 +0200
              Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-22 14:30 +0000
                Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 16:49 +0200
        Re: electron-electron vs electron-positron Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 15:59 -0500

csiph-web