Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #359417
| From | wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox |
| Date | 2015-08-02 11:00 +0000 |
| Organization | Wobbliness |
| Message-ID | <mpkt8t$gbl$2@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (13 earlier) <0a3876b9-c53c-40ab-b400-a834f3739382@googlegroups.com> <a0504b4f-d255-4a6f-a127-ffe85a212a3f@googlegroups.com> <mpj48q$uhs$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1b328075-8cdc-434e-ad5f-b012ecb2bbbd@googlegroups.com> <mpksr1$gbl$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
wobbly wrote: > JanPB wrote: > >> On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 11:48:00 AM UTC-7, wobbly wrote: >>> JanPB wrote: >>> >>> > This is very basic, it simply follows from the general formula for >>> > arc length which is sqrt(g_ij qdot^i qdot^j) dt when the coordinates >>> > ARE standard inertial, i.e. g = -c^2 dt^2 + dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 >>> >>> Is this the same as >>> >>> g = [-(cdt)², (dx)², (dy)², (dz)²] >> >> I don't know what you wrote on the right-hand side. It's not correct >> mathematics, >> so if it's some private notation that you use, explain it first. > > Are you serious, not familiar with vector notation of the same? > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_notation > >>> Why don't you say so. What is g anyway, arc length? On which circle? >> >> Not on circle (what an idea!). g is the Minkowski metric coefficients >> given with respect to some noninertial coordinates (like those of the >> travelling twin). > > I don't understand a word of what you say. That must be a STERADIAN, not > an arc. I should rather say, a surface delimited by a steradian. > I must insist, having an arc without a circle defies all laws of > Nature. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arc_%28geometry%29 > > Please remark the detailed figure on right side.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Julio Di Egidio" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2015-07-23 14:49 +0100
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-23 06:54 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 07:24 -0700
Stephane Baune puffs himself up "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-23 07:31 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune puffs himself up "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-23 10:35 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune puffs himself up and proves himself a severely delusional POS "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-23 11:12 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-07-24 11:44 +1000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-07-23 22:00 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 04:50 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-07-25 08:34 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 09:06 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 09:04 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-07-27 16:40 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 14:42 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 14:58 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 16:25 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-28 14:08 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-07-29 19:26 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 12:47 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-07-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:42 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-29 12:59 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-07-29 20:10 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 22:21 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-08-02 10:53 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-08-02 11:00 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 21:07 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-03 15:11 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 22:57 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 22:57 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 09:49 -0500
csiph-web