Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #358488
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox |
| Date | 2015-07-24 11:44 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <d1djj2Flk9oU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <mo5s70$vaf$1@dont-email.me> <d1bglqF50fuU1@mid.individual.net> <moqrbi$apn$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 23/07/2015 11:49 PM, Julio Di Egidio wrote: > "Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in message > news:d1bglqF50fuU1@mid.individual.net... > >> The OP seems to have abandoned this thread. It's probably too much to >> hope that this is because he's finally grasped the truth, being that >> there's no paradox. > > You wish. This discussion has rather confirmed that there is a problem > with relativity rooted into special relativity already. But I keep > monitoring the thread, just nothing new is coming up: e.g. that you are > only contributing fallacies has been pointed out already (you > incompetent troll). > > BTW, my idea so far is not that relativity is inconsistent, in fact I > still have found no evidence for that, but relativity, at least the > common picture we are given of it, is certainly incomplete: the > paradoxes rather call for something more fundamental than space-time, > and that is or has to do with conscience and causality. Well, that is > the line of research anyway... > > No worries, I'll keep you posted. > > Julio > > We're still waiting for your math. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Julio Di Egidio" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2015-07-23 14:49 +0100
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-23 06:54 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 07:24 -0700
Stephane Baune puffs himself up "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-23 07:31 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune puffs himself up "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-23 10:35 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune puffs himself up and proves himself a severely delusional POS "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-23 11:12 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-07-24 11:44 +1000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-07-23 22:00 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 04:50 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-07-25 08:34 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 09:06 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 09:04 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-07-27 16:40 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 14:42 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 14:58 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 16:25 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-28 14:08 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-07-29 19:26 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 12:47 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-07-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:42 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-29 12:59 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-07-29 20:10 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 22:21 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-08-02 10:53 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-08-02 11:00 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 21:07 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-03 15:11 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-09 22:24 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 17:59 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Felipe Delgado <fd@spreadspectrum.org> - 2015-08-10 18:24 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 11:33 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-19 22:16 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-19 18:43 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:24 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-21 02:44 -0400
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-19 22:10 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Felipe Delgado <fd@spreadspectrum.org> - 2015-08-11 18:19 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 22:57 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 22:57 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 09:49 -0500
csiph-web