Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #358803

Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/26/2015 12:57 AM, Koobee Wublee wrote:
> On Friday, July 24, 2015 at 4:32:37 PM UTC-7, JanPB wrote:
>> On Friday, July 24, 2015 at 3:48:57 PM UTC-7, Koobee Wublee wrote:
>
>>> Jan the relativistic moron needs to learn the basics.  Here is one of
>>> many blunders of Jan the relativistic moron.  Given the following
>>> geometry,
>>
>>> **  dS^2 = c^2 dt^2 - ds^2
>>
>>> When Koobee Wublee rewrote the above into the following, Jan the
>>> relativistic moron objected:
>>
>>> **  dS^2 / c^2 = dt^2 (1 - B^2)
>>
>>> Where
>>
>>> **  B^2 c^2 = (ds/dt)^2
>>
>>> According to Jan's "wisdom", since dt and ds are independent to each
>>> other, (ds/dt) must be zero.  <shrug>
>>
>> Obviously if dS^2 = c^2 dt^2 - ds^2 with independent dt and ds
>> (the latter is a terrible choice of letter, BTW), then it's
>> mathematically impossible to have any relation of the type:
>>
>>      dS^2 / c^2 = dt^2 (1 - B^2)
>>
>> ...because that would say that a vector space could be both
>> 2-dimensional and 1-dimensional.
>
> Is there another Einstein dingleberry that agrees with Jan the relativistic moron?
> Tom, PD, Paul Anersens, or professor Carlip?

I'm none of those but I agree with Jan, and he also agrees with what's 
in textbooks.

> Koobee Wublee will take lack of response
> from Einstein dingleberries as disagreeing with Jan the relativistic moron.

Nobody really cares what you're going to take about what, Koobee. Nobody 
is going to leap to your dares and taunts.

> It looks
> like Jan the relativistic moron is on its own.  Why doesn't Jan the relativistic moron
> name a single textbook that agrees with this imbecile's nonsense?  <shrug>
>
>> [rest of nonsense about the Riemann tensor snipped]


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Julio Di Egidio" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2015-07-23 14:49 +0100
  Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-23 06:54 -0700
  Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 07:24 -0700
    Stephane Baune puffs himself up "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-23 07:31 -0700
      Re: Stephane Baune puffs himself up "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-23 10:35 -0700
      Re: Stephane Baune puffs himself up and proves himself  a severely delusional POS "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-23 11:12 -0700
  Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-07-24 11:44 +1000
  Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-07-23 22:00 -0500
    Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 04:50 -0700
    Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-07-25 08:34 -0700
      Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 09:06 -0700
    Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 09:04 -0700
      Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-07-27 16:40 -0500
      Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 14:42 -0700
        Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 14:58 -0700
          Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 16:25 -0700
          Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-28 14:08 -0700
      Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-07-29 19:26 +0000
        Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 12:47 -0700
          Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-07-29 20:08 +0000
            Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:42 -0700
        Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-29 12:59 -0700
          Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-07-29 20:10 +0000
      Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 22:21 -0700
        Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-08-02 10:53 +0000
          Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-08-02 11:00 +0000
          Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 21:07 -0700
            Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-03 15:11 +0000
    Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 22:57 -0700
    Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 22:57 -0700
      Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 09:49 -0500

csiph-web