Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #359040
| From | wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox |
| Date | 2015-07-29 20:08 +0000 |
| Organization | Wobbliness |
| Message-ID | <mpbbr9$air$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (13 earlier) <106f4930-1274-49e2-b64e-1bf2aa91315e@googlegroups.com> <mpb0va$df2$2@speranza.aioe.org> <ba043b2f-d248-47ef-8af7-363ab3e5b3b5@googlegroups.com> <mpb9cf$4vt$1@speranza.aioe.org> <73cf5571-ff43-4270-9db3-a7246c8e6ff5@googlegroups.com> |
JanPB wrote: > On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 12:26:12 PM UTC-7, wobbly wrote: >> JanPB wrote: >> >> > On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 10:02:38 AM UTC-7, wobbly wrote: >> >> JanPB wrote: >> >> >> >> >> You can stand confidently alongside other such perverts, >> >> >> for example: Lenin, Stalin, Castro, ect. >> >> > >> >> > MUAHAHAHA! All this for pointing out an incorrect arc length >> >> > formula! >> >> >> >> Lenin was a good man, extremely intelligent. The unaware just think, >> >> heck, >> >> Lenin, communist etc. But these individuals are just walking without >> >> thinking, that Lenin is even more valid and actual today. >> > >> > Lenin was actually a first-rate mass murderer and war criminal who >> > destroyed Russia. The legend of "good Lenin whose ideas were >> > perverted by Stalin" is just that, a legend. Long story. >> >> Is this true? I mean, you should be able to come up with something >> empirical, not legends, as you say. Speaking the witch, how many Poles >> perished about sixty years ago because of what? I'm just asking. >> >> I heard stories that in Russia the electricity, water, heat and public >> transportation was free to its citizens. Also, they were the first in >> technologies, space exploration, relativity and quantum mechanics. I'm >> just asking. Maybe they lied to us. > > It's impossible to address this here. Historians are still researching > it as the relevant archives became available only after 1989. It's not > so much "lies" as wishful thinking perhaps. Until Russia shakes off the > nightmare called "Lenin", nothing will change there. Problem is, > everything in Russia takes roughly 10x longer than everywhere else. Luis > Buñuel, the famous Spanish film director, observed once that if the > Bolshevik revolution took place in some South American country, the > whole nonsense would be over in just few years. I was expecting empirical answers to those question, since you appear so knowledgeable. This because I am born yesterday and don't know what to believe. If this is also your way in write scientific papers, be sure I never will read them. It would be a waste of time. Try focusing on what is been said, in stead of whatever not related insinuation and such. How can that take 10x longer when they were the first in so many, many domains. Take a look what is happening now, is this because of Lenin too? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVbfTAq0M8U
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Julio Di Egidio" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2015-07-23 14:49 +0100
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-23 06:54 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 07:24 -0700
Stephane Baune puffs himself up "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-23 07:31 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune puffs himself up "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-23 10:35 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune puffs himself up and proves himself a severely delusional POS "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-23 11:12 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-07-24 11:44 +1000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-07-23 22:00 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 04:50 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-07-25 08:34 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 09:06 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 09:04 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-07-27 16:40 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 14:42 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 14:58 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 16:25 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-28 14:08 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-07-29 19:26 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 12:47 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-07-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:42 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-29 12:59 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-07-29 20:10 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 22:21 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-08-02 10:53 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox wobbly <wobbly@dont-email.me> - 2015-08-02 11:00 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 21:07 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-03 15:11 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-09 22:24 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 17:59 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Felipe Delgado <fd@spreadspectrum.org> - 2015-08-10 18:24 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 11:33 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-19 22:16 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-19 18:43 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:24 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-21 02:44 -0400
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 23:58 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-21 08:14 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-19 22:10 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Felipe Delgado <fd@spreadspectrum.org> - 2015-08-11 18:19 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 22:57 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 22:57 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 09:49 -0500
csiph-web