Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > uk.comp.sys.mac > #181650

Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source"

From "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk>
Newsgroups alt.computer.workshop, uk.comp.sys.mac
Subject Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source"
Date 2025-08-11 10:14 +0100
Message-ID <mftqj5F41g9U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <107aue1$24aiv$1@dont-email.me> <mfsdqmFsj78U1@mid.individual.net> <107c74l$2d8b5$1@dont-email.me> <mftnigF41gaU2@mid.individual.net> <107cbmg$2e840$2@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/08/2025 10:04, T i m wrote:
> On 11/08/2025 09:22, David B. wrote:
> 
> <snip the bs / waffle unread>>>
>>> WTF are you going on about now (oh, I don't what to know as it's all 
>>> BS)? Oh yes, more stuff you don't have a fucking clue about.
>>
>> Thank you for confirming that you did, indeed, *FAIL* to repair a 
>> narrowboat water pump!
> 
> And that ladies and gentlemen is how this sick fuck can twist things to 
> suit his own narrative.

Let me remind folk that it is *YOU* who is sick. Get help!
> Someone states they 'reply personally to all support questions', the 
> likes of this Brooks creep thinks that then means him so he pays for the 
> software to only get a refund from the dev rather than the dev having to 
> deal with the known creep!>
>> I did tell you that it wasn't worth the effort to try! ;-)
> And how does that make you right?
> 
> It was VERY easy to repair, it just wasn't worth the risk on financial 
> and access / inconvenience grounds, IN THIS CASE, something you had no 
> way to evaluate.
> 
> Had it been my boat / pump I would likely had repaired it because repair 
> it was easy and about 1/3rd of the cost of a new pump.
> 
> What YOU tried to tell us is that you didn't need an accumulator and you 
> were wrong, well, unless we wanted to work at whatever low standard your 
> abilities mean you get used to and I hate to think how low they must be.

I was *NOT* wrong - on a natrrowboat it is not NEEDed!

https://forums.ybw.com/threads/do-i-need-an-accumulator-in-the-fresh-water-supply.508729/

Back to uk.comp.sys.mac | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-10 12:34 +0100
  Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-10 19:20 +0100
    Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-10 11:26 -0700
    Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-10 20:15 +0100
      Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-10 21:11 +0100
        Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-10 13:15 -0700
        Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-10 21:30 +0100
          Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-10 20:34 +0000
            Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 08:18 +0100
              Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 08:52 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 09:30 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 09:53 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 10:05 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 11:02 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 13:15 +0100
              Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-11 17:05 +0000
          Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 08:46 +0100
            Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 09:22 +0100
              Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 10:04 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 10:14 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 11:26 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 11:44 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 12:27 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 13:11 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-11 17:21 +0000
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-11 21:26 +0000

csiph-web