Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.comp.sys.mac > #181653
| From | "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.computer.workshop, uk.comp.sys.mac |
| Subject | Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" |
| Date | 2025-08-11 11:44 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mftvscF5ipfU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <107c74l$2d8b5$1@dont-email.me> <mftnigF41gaU2@mid.individual.net> <107cbmg$2e840$2@dont-email.me> <mftqj5F41g9U1@mid.individual.net> <107cgga$2ff50$2@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 11/08/2025 11:26, T i m wrote: > On 11/08/2025 10:14, David B. wrote: > > <snip> > >>> And that ladies and gentlemen is how this sick fuck can twist things >>> to suit his own narrative. >> >> Let me remind folk that it is *YOU* who is sick. Get help! > > Yeah, about the best you can come up with without yer Artificial Brain. > No wonder you rely on it so much. Thick and a liar. I'm sorry that the truth hurt. :-( > <snip> > >>> What YOU tried to tell us is that you didn't need an accumulator and >>> you were wrong, well, unless we wanted to work at whatever low >>> standard your abilities mean you get used to and I hate to think how >>> low they must be. >> >> I was *NOT* wrong - on a natrrowboat it is not NEEDed! > > Ok, I get how you think denying you are a sick liar make you think > that's made is so but you are wrong. Enough people here and on every > other forum your shit over knows what you are like. AKA, a sick fuck. "Everyone is out of step except our Johnny"? >> https://forums.ybw.com/threads/do-i-need-an-accumulator-in-the-fresh- >> water-supply.508729/ > Brilliant, a thread that has as many people saying that an accumulator > is needed (and why) as those who say they have 'managed' without ... and > with no mention of what type of pumps are being used in each instance. > > So just as last time, here are the reasons why accumulators ARE fitted: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkPI-uFlrFA > > Now, you might not be able to see that for all the tabs (you don't know > how to close) for the forums you are banned from (for being an annoying > little prick and a complete waste of bandwidth, even in these high > bandwidth days!). > > And oh look, specifically regarding narrowboats: > > https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=pump+accumilator+narrowboat > > So, even when you have supposed to have lived on one, you know fuck all > about them (probably an alcohol fed hallucination that's now turned real > to you, like with the crusade you have been sent on that you are > *COMPLETELY* unsuitable and unequipped for. I tried to *HELP* you based on my personal experience and the comments I'd picked up over more than thirty years of narrowboating. You simply failed to listen. > Is there *ANYONE* here who hasn't questioned that and your 'detective' > skills? Yes. -- David
Back to uk.comp.sys.mac | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-10 12:34 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-10 19:20 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-10 11:26 -0700
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-10 20:15 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-10 21:11 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-10 13:15 -0700
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-10 21:30 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-10 20:34 +0000
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 08:18 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 08:52 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 09:30 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 09:53 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 10:05 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 11:02 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 13:15 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-11 17:05 +0000
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 08:46 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 09:22 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 10:04 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 10:14 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 11:26 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 11:44 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 12:27 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 13:11 +0100
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-11 17:21 +0000
Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-11 21:26 +0000
csiph-web