Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,uk.comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source"
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 10:14:13 +0100
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <mftqj5F41g9U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <mfr7slFko2dU2@mid.individual.net> <1079rp0$1qrph$1@dont-email.me> <mfreeoFn44mU1@mid.individual.net> <107antp$22i1n$1@dont-email.me> <mfs9e0Frc23U1@mid.individual.net> <107aue1$24aiv$1@dont-email.me> <mfsdqmFsj78U1@mid.individual.net> <107c74l$2d8b5$1@dont-email.me> <mftnigF41gaU2@mid.individual.net> <107cbmg$2e840$2@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: boaterdave@hotmail.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net ozZ2Ub90ekNvNV2WFn7JrwvDdKI9pPW/0I4v7ZRWpBCSSxS8eC
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4tdFHTU8E5/1a09JG7WFjGEFvg8= sha256:nTJi3TR5xXoxuL96GisXy0gCvDQlQHg4R15RmTSxLl8=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <107cbmg$2e840$2@dont-email.me>
Xref: csiph.com uk.comp.sys.mac:181650

On 11/08/2025 10:04, T i m wrote:
> On 11/08/2025 09:22, David B. wrote:
> 
> <snip the bs / waffle unread>>>
>>> WTF are you going on about now (oh, I don't what to know as it's all 
>>> BS)? Oh yes, more stuff you don't have a fucking clue about.
>>
>> Thank you for confirming that you did, indeed, *FAIL* to repair a 
>> narrowboat water pump!
> 
> And that ladies and gentlemen is how this sick fuck can twist things to 
> suit his own narrative.

Let me remind folk that it is *YOU* who is sick. Get help!
> Someone states they 'reply personally to all support questions', the 
> likes of this Brooks creep thinks that then means him so he pays for the 
> software to only get a refund from the dev rather than the dev having to 
> deal with the known creep!>
>> I did tell you that it wasn't worth the effort to try! ;-)
> And how does that make you right?
> 
> It was VERY easy to repair, it just wasn't worth the risk on financial 
> and access / inconvenience grounds, IN THIS CASE, something you had no 
> way to evaluate.
> 
> Had it been my boat / pump I would likely had repaired it because repair 
> it was easy and about 1/3rd of the cost of a new pump.
> 
> What YOU tried to tell us is that you didn't need an accumulator and you 
> were wrong, well, unless we wanted to work at whatever low standard your 
> abilities mean you get used to and I hate to think how low they must be.

I was *NOT* wrong - on a natrrowboat it is not NEEDed!

https://forums.ybw.com/threads/do-i-need-an-accumulator-in-the-fresh-water-supply.508729/