Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > uk.comp.sys.mac > #181648

Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source"

From T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk>
Newsgroups alt.computer.workshop, uk.comp.sys.mac
Subject Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source"
Date 2025-08-11 10:04 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <107cbmg$2e840$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <mfs9e0Frc23U1@mid.individual.net> <107aue1$24aiv$1@dont-email.me> <mfsdqmFsj78U1@mid.individual.net> <107c74l$2d8b5$1@dont-email.me> <mftnigF41gaU2@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/08/2025 09:22, David B. wrote:

<snip the bs / waffle unread>>>
>> WTF are you going on about now (oh, I don't what to know as it's all 
>> BS)? Oh yes, more stuff you don't have a fucking clue about.
> 
> Thank you for confirming that you did, indeed, *FAIL* to repair a 
> narrowboat water pump!

And that ladies and gentlemen is how this sick fuck can twist things to 
suit his own narrative.

Someone states they 'reply personally to all support questions', the 
likes of this Brooks creep thinks that then means him so he pays for the 
software to only get a refund from the dev rather than the dev having to 
deal with the known creep!>
> I did tell you that it wasn't worth the effort to try! ;-)
And how does that make you right?

It was VERY easy to repair, it just wasn't worth the risk on financial 
and access / inconvenience grounds, IN THIS CASE, something you had no 
way to evaluate.

Had it been my boat / pump I would likely had repaired it because repair 
it was easy and about 1/3rd of the cost of a new pump.

What YOU tried to tell us is that you didn't need an accumulator and you 
were wrong, well, unless we wanted to work at whatever low standard your 
abilities mean you get used to and I hate to think how low they must be.

Cheers, T i m

Back to uk.comp.sys.mac | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-10 12:34 +0100
  Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-10 19:20 +0100
    Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-10 11:26 -0700
    Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-10 20:15 +0100
      Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-10 21:11 +0100
        Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-10 13:15 -0700
        Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-10 21:30 +0100
          Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-10 20:34 +0000
            Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 08:18 +0100
              Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 08:52 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 09:30 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 09:53 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 10:05 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 11:02 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 13:15 +0100
              Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-11 17:05 +0000
          Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 08:46 +0100
            Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 09:22 +0100
              Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 10:04 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 10:14 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 11:26 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 11:44 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-11 12:27 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-11 13:11 +0100
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-11 17:21 +0000
                Re: EtreCheck - claimed by ChatGPT to be "Open Source" Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-11 21:26 +0000

csiph-web