Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Driverless cars |
| Date | 2019-06-06 21:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gltg53Fafd0U5@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <qd8ag8$d0h$5@dont-email.me> <glq6paFafd0U1@mid.individual.net> <qd9vvb$l9f$1@dont-email.me> <gls2n7Fafd0U4@mid.individual.net> <qdbudd$dap$1@dont-email.me> |
On Thu, 06 Jun 2019 13:51:57 -0700, The Real Bev wrote: > On 06/06/2019 01:55 AM, Bob Eager wrote: >> On Wed, 05 Jun 2019 20:06:18 -0700, The Real Bev wrote: >> >>> On 06/05/2019 08:52 AM, Bob Eager wrote: >>>> On Wed, 05 Jun 2019 11:53:44 +0000, Rich wrote: >>>> >>>>> I read "speed tracking" as what cars here in the US term "cruise >>>>> control" which is simply "maintain an operator set speed". >>>>> >>>>> Is "speed tracking" something more than just maintaining an operator >>>>> set speed? >>>> >>>> For me, it is. My car reads speed limit signs and adjusts the speed >>>> limiter as appropriate. >>> >>> And you can't disconnect it? What kind is it? >> >> Did I ever say you can't dosconnect it? In fact, you have to turn it on >> if you want it. Very good where speed limits constantly change. > > Sorry. I'm a Californian and we frequently regard speed limits as > suggestions. The idea that a car would obey them against our wills is > bothersome. It's not against my will, though. I choose to turn it on. Esay to get caught otherwise. (the car also warns of upcoming speed cameras, but not following police cars!) -- Using UNIX since v6 (1975)... Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-05-31 11:43 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-05-31 22:14 +1000
Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-05-31 14:41 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2019-05-31 20:16 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-06-02 00:22 +0100
Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-06-02 11:58 +0100
Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2019-05-31 18:08 +0100
Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-06-01 12:47 +1000
Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2019-06-01 20:29 +0000
Re: Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail) RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2019-06-02 16:30 +0000
Re: Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2019-06-02 23:17 +0000
Re: Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail) Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-04 00:02 +0000
Re: Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail) Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-06-04 18:43 +0100
Re: Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail) Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-04 21:55 +0100
Re: Driverless cars not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-06-04 22:57 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-06-05 11:53 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-06-05 15:52 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-05 16:28 +0000
Re: Driverless cars not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-06-05 23:10 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-06-05 23:47 +0000
Re: Driverless cars The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2019-06-05 20:06 -0700
Re: Driverless cars Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-06-06 08:55 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-06 12:39 +0100
Re: Driverless cars Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-06-06 16:51 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-06 20:35 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-06 23:39 +0200
Re: Driverless cars Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-06-07 08:17 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2019-06-07 09:39 +0100
Re: Driverless cars Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2019-06-07 00:26 +0000
Re: Driverless cars kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-06-07 18:08 -0400
Re: Driverless cars not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-06-07 23:50 +0000
Re: Driverless cars The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2019-06-06 13:51 -0700
Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-06 23:39 +0200
Re: Driverless cars Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-06-06 21:50 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-05 16:28 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2019-06-05 16:58 -0300
Re: Driverless cars Stephen Hall <s__hall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-08 19:17 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-06-09 09:49 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-06-02 00:14 +0100
csiph-web