Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Driverless cars |
| Date | 2019-06-05 23:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <glr2kjFafd0U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <0001HW.22A7122801A3BEC670000F3DC2EF@news.individual.net> <qd6t0b$4s9$1@gioia.aioe.org> <qd8ag8$d0h$5@dont-email.me> <glq6paFafd0U1@mid.individual.net> <33936701.581444690.375237.ian-eruvia.org@news.individual.net> |
On Wed, 05 Jun 2019 16:28:57 +0000, Ian McCall wrote: > Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> wrote: >> On Wed, 05 Jun 2019 11:53:44 +0000, Rich wrote: >> >>> I read "speed tracking" as what cars here in the US term "cruise >>> control" >>> which is simply "maintain an operator set speed". >>> >>> Is "speed tracking" something more than just maintaining an operator >>> set speed? >> >> For me, it is. My car reads speed limit signs and adjusts the speed >> limiter as appropriate. >> >> It has normal cruise control too. > > Yes, that’s what I was implying. Also called adaptive cruise control, > though I think the Tesla does a bit more than that. No, it's not adaptive cruise control. On my car, the cruise control maintains a preset speed. Just that. The speed limiter auto adjusts according to posted speed limits. The actual speed depends on what I do with the accelerator and gears. -- Using UNIX since v6 (1975)... Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-05-31 11:43 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-05-31 22:14 +1000
Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-05-31 14:41 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2019-05-31 20:16 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-06-02 00:22 +0100
Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-06-02 11:58 +0100
Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2019-05-31 18:08 +0100
Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-06-01 12:47 +1000
Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2019-06-01 20:29 +0000
Re: Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail) RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2019-06-02 16:30 +0000
Re: Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2019-06-02 23:17 +0000
Re: Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail) Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-04 00:02 +0000
Re: Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail) Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-06-04 18:43 +0100
Re: Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail) Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-04 21:55 +0100
Re: Driverless cars not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-06-04 22:57 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-06-05 11:53 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-06-05 15:52 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-05 16:28 +0000
Re: Driverless cars not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-06-05 23:10 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-06-05 23:47 +0000
Re: Driverless cars The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2019-06-05 20:06 -0700
Re: Driverless cars Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-06-06 08:55 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-06 12:39 +0100
Re: Driverless cars Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-06-06 16:51 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-06 20:35 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-06 23:39 +0200
Re: Driverless cars Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-06-07 08:17 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2019-06-07 09:39 +0100
Re: Driverless cars Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2019-06-07 00:26 +0000
Re: Driverless cars kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-06-07 18:08 -0400
Re: Driverless cars not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-06-07 23:50 +0000
Re: Driverless cars The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2019-06-06 13:51 -0700
Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-06 23:39 +0200
Re: Driverless cars Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-06-06 21:50 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-05 16:28 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2019-06-05 16:58 -0300
Re: Driverless cars Stephen Hall <s__hall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-08 19:17 +0000
Re: Driverless cars Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-06-09 09:49 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-06-02 00:14 +0100
csiph-web