Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #18149

Re: Driverless cars

From Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.misc
Subject Re: Driverless cars
Date 2019-06-09 09:49 +0000
Organization Piglet's Pickles & Preserves
Message-ID <gm4311F6lboU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <0001HW.22A7122801A3BEC670000F3DC2EF@news.individual.net> <qd6t0b$4s9$1@gioia.aioe.org> <qd8ag8$d0h$5@dont-email.me> <1290967252.581444763.873134.ian-eruvia.org@news.individual.net> <5cfc09d9$0$10243$a92e2ab9@news.vipernews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2019-06-08, Stephen Hall <s__hall@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> wrote:
>
>> Yes, but the car does more than that. In my case a hard stop was all that
>> was required,  but there are videos out there of Teslas also steering away
>> into safety as well - safety where they take account of all traffic around
>> them. 
>
><https://www.torquenews.com/1083/how-many-tesla-autopilot-deaths-would-have-occurred-if-every-car-america-had-autopilot-thousands>

I surely hope it gets better than the first paragraph, which contains the
sensationalist (and grammaticallt incorrect) statement; "Every model that
Tesla sells has now killed an occupant while the vehicle operating on
Autopilot." So that's what, 3 or 4? (I'm not sure how many models Tesla
makes.)

Nope. It's full of fudge factors, proof by assertion and more
sensationalism. Perhaps someone who cares more than I do can work
out the number of people killed per vehicle mile on Autopilot, versus
"normal" driving, because ICBA. 

For example; "However, we can’t imagine a world where vehicles operating
autonomously drive their occupants at high speed into things on a daily
basis being allowed by regulators."

1) Autopilot isn't autonomous, so the point is specious.

2) Regulators permit human beings to kill 37,000 people a year with
cars (in the USA), so the point is specious.

Autonomous vehicles don't have to be perfect. They just have to
be better than human beings.

(FTAOD, I think Musk is an idiot, ownership of his cars has many of
the characteristics of a cult and the mainstream car manufacturers
will eat his lunch (and breakfast and dinner) once they catch up. But
this article is dross.)






-- 
Today is Setting Orange, the 14th day of Confusion in the YOLD 3185
                  Rising above bedlam

Back to comp.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-05-31 11:43 +0000
  Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-05-31 22:14 +1000
    Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-05-31 14:41 +0000
      Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2019-05-31 20:16 +0000
      Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-06-02 00:22 +0100
        Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-06-02 11:58 +0100
    Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2019-05-31 18:08 +0100
      Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-06-01 12:47 +1000
        Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2019-06-01 20:29 +0000
          Re: Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail) RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2019-06-02 16:30 +0000
            Re: Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2019-06-02 23:17 +0000
              Re: Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail) Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-04 00:02 +0000
                Re: Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail) Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-06-04 18:43 +0100
                Re: Driverless cars (Was: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is   Doomed to Fail) Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-04 21:55 +0100
                Re: Driverless cars not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-06-04 22:57 +0000
                Re: Driverless cars Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-06-05 11:53 +0000
                Re: Driverless cars Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-06-05 15:52 +0000
                Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-05 16:28 +0000
                Re: Driverless cars not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-06-05 23:10 +0000
                Re: Driverless cars Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-06-05 23:47 +0000
                Re: Driverless cars The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2019-06-05 20:06 -0700
                Re: Driverless cars Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-06-06 08:55 +0000
                Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-06 12:39 +0100
                Re: Driverless cars Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-06-06 16:51 +0000
                Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-06 20:35 +0000
                Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-06 23:39 +0200
                Re: Driverless cars Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-06-07 08:17 +0000
                Re: Driverless cars Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2019-06-07 09:39 +0100
                Re: Driverless cars Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2019-06-07 00:26 +0000
                Re: Driverless cars kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-06-07 18:08 -0400
                Re: Driverless cars not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-06-07 23:50 +0000
                Re: Driverless cars The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2019-06-06 13:51 -0700
                Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-06 23:39 +0200
                Re: Driverless cars Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-06-06 21:50 +0000
                Re: Driverless cars Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-06-05 16:28 +0000
                Re: Driverless cars Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2019-06-05 16:58 -0300
                Re: Driverless cars Stephen Hall <s__hall@gmail.com> - 2019-06-08 19:17 +0000
                Re: Driverless cars Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-06-09 09:49 +0000
    Re: [Link Posting] Why Codeless Software is Doomed to Fail Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2019-06-02 00:14 +0100

csiph-web