Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #480278

Re: Failures in reasoning

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Peter Jason" <pj@jostle.com> wrote in message 
news:6pal1etb128k7sml446tgn3ojgv60uffst@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:49:57 +1100, "Rod Speed"
> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>> Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>>> Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>> Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Many here have probably wondered why some seem to
>>>>>>>>>> think in a different way. Well, there's a possible answer.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.economist.com/united-states/2018/12/08/what-psychology-experiments-tell-you-about-why-people-deny-facts
>>
>>>>>>>>> A prize example is the reasoning of Keynesian economists
>>>>>>>>> who think endless spending is a path to prosperity.
>>
>>>>>>>>That's not what they think.
>>
>>>>>>> Oh fer chrissake....!
>>>>>>> Read on, and be chastened.....
>>>>>>> http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1877351_1877350_1877331,00.html
>>
>>>>>> Nothing to do with that silly shit of yours about Keynesian 
>>>>>> economists.
>>
>>>>>>> More snake-oiling here.....
>>>>>>> http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1847213_1847216_1847197,00.html#
>>
>>>>>> Nothing to do with that silly shit of yours about Keynesian 
>>>>>> economists.
>>
>>>>>>> It's called "Paradigm Prioritizing", that is following
>>>>>>> BLINDLY the teaching of past ages, like Darwin, Jesus,
>>>>>>> Mohammed, Marx, Keynes, Newton, and a billion more.
>>
>>>>>> Keynes never was into endless spending as a path to prosperity.
>>
>>>>>>> The trouble is that the present &
>>>>>>> future is never exactly like the past.
>>
>>>>>> Doesn't need to be. We did in fact do what was necessary
>>>>>> when the worst recession since the great depression
>>>>>> showed up and recovered much more quickly than
>>>>>> we did after the great depression because we did.
>>
>>>>> You have but postponed it.
>>
>>>> Nope, the unemployment rate has returned to what it
>>>> was before most of the world financial system imploded.
>>
>>> You're so naive.....
>>
>>We'll see...
>>
>><reams of the shit you always end up with
>>when you have got done like a fucking dinner,
>>as you always are, flushed where it belongs>
>>
>>> The definition of "employment" is very elastic
>>> and hardly corresponds to that of before 2000.
>>
>>Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you
>>usually manage, and that's saying something.
>>
>>> A man working one day a week is "employed".
>>> So what?
>>
>>So anyone who wants work who
>>isnt unemployable can get it.
>>
>>>>> The Man in the Street is still up to his nuts in debt,
>>
>>>>Because with interest rates so low, that's what makes sense.
>>
>>> This is the sort of thinking a good recession will fix.
>>
>>The 2008 recession, the worst since the great depression, didn't.
>>
>>>>> groaning under a huge mortgage,
>>
>>>> Because with interest rates so low, that's what makes sense.
>>
>>> This is the sort of thinking a good recession will fix.
>>
>>The 2008 recession, the worst since the great depression, didn't.
>>
>>>>> and the housing boom is the only game in town.
>>
>>>> Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually
>>>> manage. And the boom has come off for quite a
>>>> while now in Sydney, Melburg, Perth and BrizVegas.
>>
>>> It's not dead yet,
>>
>>It won't ever be dead, you watch.
>>
>>> and we'll see if the goons in power will
>>> lower interest rates still further to maintain
>>> the Boom, AND their investments in it.
>>
>>Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage.
>>
>>> Bad luck about rising interest rates overseas though.
>>
>>Ours are already higher than theirs, you pig ignorant clown.
>>
>>>>> Oz wages are spent overseas
>>
>>>> Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage.
>>
>>> ...uh, it was a little boy who saw the Emperor had no clothes.
>>
>>Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage.
>>
>>>>> and investment income is miniscule.
>>
>>>> Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage.
>>
>>> ...uh, it was a little boy who saw the Emperor had no clothes.
>>
>>Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage.
>>
>>>>> Only a recession can alter the spendthrift thinking.
>>
>>>> Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage.
>>
>>>>> Just wait and see.
>>
>>>> We've seen, we didn't even get a recession when
>>>> most of the world financial system imploded
>>>> spectacularly and NOT ONE retail bank imploded
>>>> here or even needed  to be bailed out either.
>>
>>>>> A hard rain's gonna fall;
>>
>>>> Fools claimed that in 2008, didn't happen here.
>>
>>>>> something wicked this way comes;
>>>>> the music's gonna stop; etc.
>>
>>>> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed drunken fantasyland.
>>
>>>>> Wake up Oz!
>>
>>>> Go back to sleep, stupid.
>>
>>>>>>>>> Thrift is the only way, tried and proved.
>>
>>>>>>>> Even sillier than you usually manage, and that's saying something.

<reams of the shit you always end up with
when you have got done like a fucking dinner,
as you always are, flushed where it belongs>
 

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Failures in reasoning Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2018-12-17 12:12 +1100
  Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-17 12:47 +1100
    Re: Failures in reasoning "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-16 18:25 -0800
    Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-17 15:51 +1100
      Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-18 09:13 +1100
        Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 12:16 +1100
          Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-19 12:27 +1100
            Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 14:15 +1100
              Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-19 14:56 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 15:49 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-20 07:36 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-19 12:53 -0800
                Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 14:45 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-20 15:58 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 17:23 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-21 09:50 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 15:16 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-22 09:51 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 10:25 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-22 10:47 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 13:57 +1100
  Re: Failures in reasoning Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-12-16 19:56 -0800
    Re: Failures in reasoning Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2018-12-17 22:22 +1100
  Re: Failures in reasoning mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-12-17 04:51 -0800
  Re: Failures in reasoning JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-17 14:37 -0800

csiph-web