Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #480409
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, aus.legal |
| Subject | Re: Failures in reasoning |
| Date | 2018-12-22 10:25 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <g85b2kFncndU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <577m1e564hd64qo9pul24vl3vs68aajn4v@4ax.com> <g80qr5Fnir9U1@mid.individual.net> <tq6o1ethcps5ni1qr25m61uchncgp3npn9@4ax.com> <g837p5F967mU1@mid.individual.net> <4jrq1ep8sid6db5rptnsrle4g77df0bp8k@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Peter Jason" <pj@jostle.com> wrote in message news:4jrq1ep8sid6db5rptnsrle4g77df0bp8k@4ax.com... > On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 15:16:29 +1100, "Rod Speed" > <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>"Peter Jason" <pj@jostle.com> wrote in message >>news:tq6o1ethcps5ni1qr25m61uchncgp3npn9@4ax.com... >>> On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 17:23:23 +1100, "Rod Speed" >>> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>"Peter Jason" <pj@jostle.com> wrote in message >>>>news:577m1e564hd64qo9pul24vl3vs68aajn4v@4ax.com... >>>>> On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 14:45:45 +1100, "Rod Speed" >>>>> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>"Peter Jason" <pj@jostle.com> wrote in message >>>>>>news:6pal1etb128k7sml446tgn3ojgv60uffst@4ax.com... >>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:49:57 +1100, "Rod Speed" >>>>>>> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote >>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>> Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>> Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Many here have probably wondered why some seem to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think in a different way. Well, there's a possible answer. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.economist.com/united-states/2018/12/08/what-psychology-experiments-tell-you-about-why-people-deny-facts >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A prize example is the reasoning of Keynesian economists >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who think endless spending is a path to prosperity. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>That's not what they think. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh fer chrissake....! >>>>>>>>>>>>> Read on, and be chastened..... >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1877351_1877350_1877331,00.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing to do with that silly shit of yours about Keynesian >>>>>>>>>>>> economists. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> More snake-oiling here..... >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1847213_1847216_1847197,00.html# >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing to do with that silly shit of yours about Keynesian >>>>>>>>>>>> economists. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It's called "Paradigm Prioritizing", that is following >>>>>>>>>>>>> BLINDLY the teaching of past ages, like Darwin, Jesus, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mohammed, Marx, Keynes, Newton, and a billion more. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Keynes never was into endless spending as a path to prosperity. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The trouble is that the present & >>>>>>>>>>>>> future is never exactly like the past. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't need to be. We did in fact do what was necessary >>>>>>>>>>>> when the worst recession since the great depression >>>>>>>>>>>> showed up and recovered much more quickly than >>>>>>>>>>>> we did after the great depression because we did. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You have but postponed it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nope, the unemployment rate has returned to what it >>>>>>>>>> was before most of the world financial system imploded. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You're so naive..... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>We'll see... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>><reams of the shit you always end up with >>>>>>>>when you have got done like a fucking dinner, >>>>>>>>as you always are, flushed where it belongs> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The definition of "employment" is very elastic >>>>>>>>> and hardly corresponds to that of before 2000. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you >>>>>>>>usually manage, and that's saying something. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A man working one day a week is "employed". >>>>>>>>> So what? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>So anyone who wants work who >>>>>>>>isnt unemployable can get it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The Man in the Street is still up to his nuts in debt, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Because with interest rates so low, that's what makes sense. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is the sort of thinking a good recession will fix. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>The 2008 recession, the worst since the great depression, didn't. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> groaning under a huge mortgage, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Because with interest rates so low, that's what makes sense. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is the sort of thinking a good recession will fix. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>The 2008 recession, the worst since the great depression, didn't. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> and the housing boom is the only game in town. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually >>>>>>>>>> manage. And the boom has come off for quite a >>>>>>>>>> while now in Sydney, Melburg, Perth and BrizVegas. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's not dead yet, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>It won't ever be dead, you watch. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and we'll see if the goons in power will >>>>>>>>> lower interest rates still further to maintain >>>>>>>>> the Boom, AND their investments in it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bad luck about rising interest rates overseas though. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Ours are already higher than theirs, you pig ignorant clown. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Oz wages are spent overseas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ...uh, it was a little boy who saw the Emperor had no clothes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> and investment income is miniscule. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ...uh, it was a little boy who saw the Emperor had no clothes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Only a recession can alter the spendthrift thinking. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Just wait and see. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We've seen, we didn't even get a recession when >>>>>>>>>> most of the world financial system imploded >>>>>>>>>> spectacularly and NOT ONE retail bank imploded >>>>>>>>>> here or even needed to be bailed out either. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> A hard rain's gonna fall; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Fools claimed that in 2008, didn't happen here. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> something wicked this way comes; >>>>>>>>>>> the music's gonna stop; etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed drunken fantasyland. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Wake up Oz! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Go back to sleep, stupid. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thrift is the only way, tried and proved. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even sillier than you usually manage, and that's saying >>>>>>>>>>>>>> something. >>>>>> >>>>>><reams of the shit you always end up with >>>>>>when you have got done like a fucking dinner, >>>>>>as you always are, flushed where it belongs> >>>> >>>>> Why do I imagine you're up to you ears in debt, >>>> >>>>There you go, face down in the mud, as always. >>>>No debt what so ever to anyone and havent had >>>>any debt what so ever for more than 50 fucking >>>>years and the last of it was only because the NSW >>>>state govt used to flog blocks of land off here >>>>for either cash or payments over 20 years or >>>>something with a derisory interest rate charged >>>>and I was earning far more in the stock market >>>>on that money than the interest rate I paid, >>>>so there was no point in paying it off. >>>> >>>>> if not to a bookie then to some property-loans shark? >>>> >>>>There you go, face down in the mud, as always. >>>>I have only ever bet on the horses just once, on >>>>the melbourne cup, when I came here for a job >>>>interview. And I won that bet and got the job too. >>>> >>>>> Do you think that kicked-upstairs geriatric at >>>>> the Reserve Bank will lower interest rates so >>>>> the goons in Canberra can get your vote? >>>> >>>>Unlikely given that they hiked them in >>>>the runup to one federal election which >>>>the coalition won comfortably anyway. >>>> >>>>> Wake up boy! >>>> >>>>Go back to sleep, you silly clown. >>>> >>>>> If I were you I'd get prepared by stocking up on tinned >>>>> fish & bottled water for the looming apocalypse >>>> >>>>Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed drunken fantasys. >>>> >>>>> AND I'd ferret out a fake passport to flee >>>>> when the bailiffs arrive to seize your chattels. >>>> >>>>Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed drunken fantasys. >>>> >>>>> You have been warned. >>>> >>>>We've all been wanked at by some drug crazed drunken clown, actually. >>>> >>> >>> Beware complacency! It may be comfortable in your present state....... >>> ...........but things can change for the worst. >> >>No they can't in my case <reams of the shit you always end up with when you have got done like a fucking dinner, as you always are, flushed where it belongs>
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Failures in reasoning Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2018-12-17 12:12 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-17 12:47 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-16 18:25 -0800
Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-17 15:51 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-18 09:13 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 12:16 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-19 12:27 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 14:15 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-19 14:56 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 15:49 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-20 07:36 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-19 12:53 -0800
Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 14:45 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-20 15:58 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 17:23 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-21 09:50 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 15:16 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-22 09:51 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 10:25 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-22 10:47 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 13:57 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-12-16 19:56 -0800
Re: Failures in reasoning Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2018-12-17 22:22 +1100
Re: Failures in reasoning mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-12-17 04:51 -0800
Re: Failures in reasoning JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-17 14:37 -0800
csiph-web