Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #480202

Re: Failures in reasoning

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>> Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> wrote
>>>>>>> Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote

>>>>>>>> Many here have probably wondered why some seem to
>>>>>>>> think in a different way. Well, there's a possible answer.

>>>>>>>> https://www.economist.com/united-states/2018/12/08/what-psychology-experiments-tell-you-about-why-people-deny-facts

>>>>>>> A prize example is the reasoning of Keynesian economists
>>>>>>> who think endless spending is a path to prosperity.

>>>>>>That's not what they think.

>>>>> Oh fer chrissake....!
>>>>> Read on, and be chastened.....
>>>>> http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1877351_1877350_1877331,00.html

>>>> Nothing to do with that silly shit of yours about Keynesian economists.

>>>>> More snake-oiling here.....
>>>>> http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1847213_1847216_1847197,00.html#

>>>> Nothing to do with that silly shit of yours about Keynesian economists.

>>>>> It's called "Paradigm Prioritizing", that is following
>>>>> BLINDLY the teaching of past ages, like Darwin, Jesus,
>>>>> Mohammed, Marx, Keynes, Newton, and a billion more.

>>>> Keynes never was into endless spending as a path to prosperity.

>>>>> The trouble is that the present &
>>>>> future is never exactly like the past.

>>>> Doesn't need to be. We did in fact do what was necessary
>>>> when the worst recession since the great depression
>>>> showed up and recovered much more quickly than
>>>> we did after the great depression because we did.

>>> You have but postponed it.

>> Nope, the unemployment rate has returned to what it
>> was before most of the world financial system imploded.

> You're so naive.....

We'll see...

<reams of the shit you always end up with
when you have got done like a fucking dinner,
as you always are, flushed where it belongs>

> The definition of "employment" is very elastic
> and hardly corresponds to that of before 2000.

Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you
usually manage, and that's saying something.

> A man working one day a week is "employed".
> So what?

So anyone who wants work who
isnt unemployable can get it.

>>> The Man in the Street is still up to his nuts in debt,

>>Because with interest rates so low, that's what makes sense.

> This is the sort of thinking a good recession will fix.

The 2008 recession, the worst since the great depression, didn't.

>>> groaning under a huge mortgage,

>> Because with interest rates so low, that's what makes sense.

> This is the sort of thinking a good recession will fix.

The 2008 recession, the worst since the great depression, didn't.

>>> and the housing boom is the only game in town.

>> Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually
>> manage. And the boom has come off for quite a
>> while now in Sydney, Melburg, Perth and BrizVegas.

> It's not dead yet,

It won't ever be dead, you watch.

> and we'll see if the goons in power will
> lower interest rates still further to maintain
> the Boom, AND their investments in it.

Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

> Bad luck about rising interest rates overseas though.

Ours are already higher than theirs, you pig ignorant clown.

>>> Oz wages are spent overseas

>> Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

> ...uh, it was a little boy who saw the Emperor had no clothes.

Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

>>> and investment income is miniscule.

>> Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

> ...uh, it was a little boy who saw the Emperor had no clothes.

Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

>>> Only a recession can alter the spendthrift thinking.

>> Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

>>> Just wait and see.

>> We've seen, we didn't even get a recession when
>> most of the world financial system imploded
>> spectacularly and NOT ONE retail bank imploded
>> here or even needed  to be bailed out either.

>>> A hard rain's gonna fall;

>> Fools claimed that in 2008, didn't happen here.

>>> something wicked this way comes;
>>> the music's gonna stop; etc.

>> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed drunken fantasyland.

>>> Wake up Oz!

>> Go back to sleep, stupid.

>>>>>>> Thrift is the only way, tried and proved.

>>>>>> Even sillier than you usually manage, and that's saying something.

<reams of the shit you always end up with
when you have got done like a fucking dinner,
as you always are, flushed where it belongs>
 

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Failures in reasoning Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2018-12-17 12:12 +1100
  Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-17 12:47 +1100
    Re: Failures in reasoning "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-16 18:25 -0800
    Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-17 15:51 +1100
      Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-18 09:13 +1100
        Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 12:16 +1100
          Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-19 12:27 +1100
            Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 14:15 +1100
              Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-19 14:56 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 15:49 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-20 07:36 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-19 12:53 -0800
                Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 14:45 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-20 15:58 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 17:23 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-21 09:50 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 15:16 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-22 09:51 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 10:25 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2018-12-22 10:47 +1100
                Re: Failures in reasoning "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 13:57 +1100
  Re: Failures in reasoning Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-12-16 19:56 -0800
    Re: Failures in reasoning Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2018-12-17 22:22 +1100
  Re: Failures in reasoning mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-12-17 04:51 -0800
  Re: Failures in reasoning JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-17 14:37 -0800

csiph-web