Re: number 28

Newsgroups	sci.physics
Date	2015-12-20 11:54 -0800
References	<5675C906.991@ix.netcom.com> <n561ni$3q0$1@dont-email.me> <5677006F.E31@ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID	<fc862139-e4e8-40a1-aeb7-6e423c4614bf@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: number 28
From	Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sunday, December 20, 2015 at 2:24:38 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> Poutnik wrote:
> > 
> > Dne 19/12/2015 v 22:15 The Starmaker napsal(a):
> > > http://www.engadget.com/2015/12/18/log-into-most-any-linux-system-by-hitting-backspace-28-times/
> > >
> > >
> > > i discovered the number 28
> > > works on other systems too!
> > >
> > > for example on twitter
> > > when you get the
> > > message you used up
> > > following limit...
> > > you hit 28
> > > and you bypass the limit!
> > >
> > > Is number 28 a magic number?
> > >
> > Yes, 28 IS one of "magic numbers", in context of nuclear physics. :-)
> > 
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_number_%28physics%29
> > 
> > Quote:
> > In nuclear physics, a magic number is a number of nucleons (either
> > protons or neutrons) such that they are arranged into complete shells
> > within the atomic nucleus. The seven most widely recognized magic
> > numbers as of 2007 are 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, and 126.
> 
> well there is a 2, in 28
> 
> then you have  2, 8, 
> 
> which is 28
> 
> then 20,
> 
> 
> which is 2, 8, 20 = a 28
> 
> then you have 28,
> 
> 
> skip 50 (i don't know how it got in there, must  be some mistake)
> 
> then you have 126, 6 +2 is 8 that's 1 28
> 
> 
> it must be magic.

It must be comic. Try reading/listening before writing/talking. 

> Do they have backspace on ATM machines? I'll wait to the 28th to try it!

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=7x13+28+abbott+costello

-- Mahipal "IPMM... Because humans can be so dense, black holes exist."

Thread

number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-19 13:15 -0800
  Re: number 28 chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-19 17:10 -0600
    Re: number 28 deathby@snu-snu.com (Phillip J. Fry) - 2015-12-20 00:31 +0000
      Re: number 28 chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-19 21:38 -0600
    Re: number 28 FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2015-12-20 08:27 -0500
      Re: number 28 Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2015-12-20 10:15 -0500
  Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-19 21:43 -0800
    Re: number 28 G. Morgan <sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> - 2015-12-22 12:36 -0600
      Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 10:55 -0800
        Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 20:21 +0100
          Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 12:02 -0800
            Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 21:11 +0100
          Re: number 28 G. Morgan <graham@grahammorgan.name> - 2016-01-10 18:58 -0600
        Re: number 28 G. Morgan <graham@grahammorgan.name> - 2016-01-10 18:53 -0600
  Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 12:02 +0100
    Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-20 11:24 -0800
      Re: number 28 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 11:54 -0800
      Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 21:32 +0100
        Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-20 14:02 -0800
          Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 23:18 +0100
            Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-21 13:49 -0800
              Re: number 28 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-21 16:09 -0600
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 11:06 -0800
                Re: number 28 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-27 18:31 -0600
              Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 09:49 +0100
      Re: number 28 G. Morgan <graham@grahammorgan.name> - 2016-01-10 19:04 -0600
  Re: number 28   <nisesabe@aqui.no.es> - 2015-12-27 20:10 +0100
    Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-27 11:42 -0800
      Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-27 11:47 -0800
        Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:09 -0800
          Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:12 -0800
            Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:15 -0800
              Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:26 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-10 10:23 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-10 12:14 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-10 16:28 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-11 10:21 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-11 10:37 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-13 10:56 -0800
    Re: number 28 Jens Stuckelberger <Jens_Stuckelberger@nowhere.net> - 2015-12-28 03:10 +0000

csiph-web