Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #544290

Re: number 28

Message-ID <5692BB8B.3871@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2016-01-10 12:14 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics, sci.math, alt.2600
Subject Re: number 28
References (4 earlier) <569176EC.B9C@ix.netcom.com> <569177A1.2937@ix.netcom.com> <5691785C.8F0@ix.netcom.com> <56917B0E.3BDE@ix.netcom.com> <5692A1A2.4EC4@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=A0?= wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.engadget.com/2015/12/18/log-into-most-any-linux-system-by-hitting-backspace-28-times/
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > i discovered the number 28
> > > > > > > > > works on other systems too!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > for example on twitter
> > > > > > > > > when you get the
> > > > > > > > > message you used up
> > > > > > > > > following limit...
> > > > > > > > > you hit 28
> > > > > > > > > and you bypass the limit!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Is number 28 a magic number?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yes... 28 December, the equivalent day in Spain and Hispanic America of
> > > > > > > > the "April Fools' Day" in the english world.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Are you an spanis fool... ???  :-p :-p
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools'_Day#Comparable_prank_days
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://www.lotterypost.com/lottery-report-card.asp
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  he installed self-deleting software that rigged the selection of
> > > > > > > winning numbers in games that use random number generators.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tipton installed what's known as a root kit that allowed him to
> > > > > > > manipulate the winning numbers. According to court documents, he was one
> > > > > > > of four people with access to the Hot Lotto "draw room." In 2010 he
> > > > > > > entered the draw room to update the lottery system for daylight saving
> > > > > > > time. Prosecutors allege that he manipulated the room's closed-circuit
> > > > > > > cameras while installing self-destructing software that allowed him to
> > > > > > > rig Hot Lotto drawings, thereby flipping Hot Lotto's 29 million-to-1
> > > > > > > odds of winning a jackpot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > it's the software...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://www.lotterypost.com/tag/computerized_drawings
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I didn't know they used compuerized lottery balls..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i thought maybe they used mercury.
> > > > >
> > > > > The reason Why
> > > > > the California Power Ball lottery
> > > > > is near the billion mark is because
> > > > > the lottery system is...not random.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's...broken..
> > > > > the random number generator is deterministic.
> > > > >
> > > > > Let me go inside there and fix it for you guys...
> > > > >
> > > > > I promise not to buy a lottery ticket for myself.
> > > > >
> > > > > for _ = 1, 10 do
> > > > >         print(math.random(100))
> > > > >         wait(1)
> > > > > end
> > > >
> > > > I'll fix it with this..
> > > >
> > > > /
> > > > function randomInt(min, max) {
> > > >   return Math.floor(Math.random() * (max - min)) + min;
> > > > }
> > > > //
> > > > function randomIntByModulo(min, max) {
> > > >   var i = (Math.random() * 32768) >>> 0;
> > > >   return (i % (min - max)) + min;
> > > > }
> > >
> > > don't play 69 or 69...
> > > this script is heavely biased.
> > >
> > > it's meant to be...broken.
> >
> > I'm willing to share my lottery secrets...since this is being posted to
> > alt.2600...
> >
> > all one needs to do to rasie the probibilty for 'certain numbers' to
> > be spit out, is simply to spill Coca Cola on the add-on card in the
> > lottery's computer.
> >
> > Don't use Pepsi or Seven-Up, it has to be the real thing.
> 
> Now the way you fix a horse race is
> if a race has 6 horses, you pay
> 3 jockeys to hold back the horses,then
> you play a triple with the other horses.
> 
> With lottery balls, you inject mercury.
> 
> but it seems somebody forgot
> which ball numbers contain
> the mercury.
> 
> that's like fixing
> a horse race and forgeting
> which jockey you fixed.


Now, if you're going to fix a horse race..
you wanna fix the horses that are the favorites.

So that the longshots win and the payout is bigger.

If you're going to fix lottery balls...

well, sometimes they fix it so that
certain numbers NEVER come out.

At the race track I stay away
from the nineth race because they
are always fixing the last race most
of the time.

So, when you play
the lotto...
you have to figure out
what are the fix numbers...

cause there is no such thing as..random.

Random...is an illusion.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-19 13:15 -0800
  Re: number 28 chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-19 17:10 -0600
    Re: number 28 deathby@snu-snu.com (Phillip J. Fry) - 2015-12-20 00:31 +0000
      Re: number 28 chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-19 21:38 -0600
    Re: number 28 FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2015-12-20 08:27 -0500
      Re: number 28 Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2015-12-20 10:15 -0500
  Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-19 21:43 -0800
    Re: number 28 G. Morgan <sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> - 2015-12-22 12:36 -0600
      Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 10:55 -0800
        Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 20:21 +0100
          Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 12:02 -0800
            Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 21:11 +0100
          Re: number 28 G. Morgan <graham@grahammorgan.name> - 2016-01-10 18:58 -0600
        Re: number 28 G. Morgan <graham@grahammorgan.name> - 2016-01-10 18:53 -0600
  Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 12:02 +0100
    Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-20 11:24 -0800
      Re: number 28 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 11:54 -0800
      Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 21:32 +0100
        Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-20 14:02 -0800
          Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 23:18 +0100
            Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-21 13:49 -0800
              Re: number 28 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-21 16:09 -0600
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 11:06 -0800
                Re: number 28 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-27 18:31 -0600
              Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 09:49 +0100
      Re: number 28 G. Morgan <graham@grahammorgan.name> - 2016-01-10 19:04 -0600
  Re: number 28   <nisesabe@aqui.no.es> - 2015-12-27 20:10 +0100
    Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-27 11:42 -0800
      Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-27 11:47 -0800
        Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:09 -0800
          Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:12 -0800
            Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:15 -0800
              Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:26 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-10 10:23 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-10 12:14 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-10 16:28 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-11 10:21 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-11 10:37 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-13 10:56 -0800
    Re: number 28 Jens Stuckelberger <Jens_Stuckelberger@nowhere.net> - 2015-12-28 03:10 +0000

csiph-web