Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #540852

Re: number 28

Message-ID <56799F38.2339@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2015-12-22 11:06 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics, sci.math, alt.2600
Subject Re: number 28
References (3 earlier) <n5734g$4mp$1@dont-email.me> <5677257C.33F6@ix.netcom.com> <n579b3$rl3$1@dont-email.me> <567873E0.52EB@ix.netcom.com> <n59tbk$83b$3@speranza.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Sergio wrote:
> 
> On 12/21/2015 3:49 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Poutnik wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > Or is it just easier to use software to pick lottery numbers?
> >
> > http://www.seattlepi.com/news/us/article/Jackpot-fixing-investigation-expands-to-more-6707355.php
> >
> >
> 
> ha,
> I forwared that link to our state attourney general, to check the
> lottery here.
> 
> generate random numbers in another state ?????????
> 
> that is evil from the very start, scam.


I Love Evil! especially evil women...


Do they have lotteries in other countries?

I was wondering...how does the software work?


http://www.seattlepi.com/news/us/article/Jackpot-fixing-investigation-expands-to-more-6707355.php


I mean, does the software control 
random numbers? Or

does the software control 
the other software in the machine? Or

does the software control 
the hardware?

does the software control 
the movement of the vibration
of the lottery balls?


The guy is not in jail so I figure he's
using his software to keep him out of jail.
http://www.seattlepi.com/news/us/article/Jackpot-fixing-investigation-expands-to-more-6707355.php


Otherwise the whole lottery system will fall apart once
kids get their hands on the software.

The whole planet lottery system is in trouble.


So, how did this guy manage to use software to pick lottery numbers???


It has to be a simple program...but what does the program control???


I'm pretty sure he is threatening to Upload it on the Internet if they try to send him to jail. 


That's what I would do! Wouldn't you?


The Starmaker

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-19 13:15 -0800
  Re: number 28 chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-19 17:10 -0600
    Re: number 28 deathby@snu-snu.com (Phillip J. Fry) - 2015-12-20 00:31 +0000
      Re: number 28 chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-19 21:38 -0600
    Re: number 28 FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2015-12-20 08:27 -0500
      Re: number 28 Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2015-12-20 10:15 -0500
  Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-19 21:43 -0800
    Re: number 28 G. Morgan <sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> - 2015-12-22 12:36 -0600
      Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 10:55 -0800
        Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 20:21 +0100
          Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 12:02 -0800
            Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 21:11 +0100
          Re: number 28 G. Morgan <graham@grahammorgan.name> - 2016-01-10 18:58 -0600
        Re: number 28 G. Morgan <graham@grahammorgan.name> - 2016-01-10 18:53 -0600
  Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 12:02 +0100
    Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-20 11:24 -0800
      Re: number 28 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 11:54 -0800
      Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 21:32 +0100
        Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-20 14:02 -0800
          Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 23:18 +0100
            Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-21 13:49 -0800
              Re: number 28 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-21 16:09 -0600
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 11:06 -0800
                Re: number 28 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-27 18:31 -0600
              Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 09:49 +0100
      Re: number 28 G. Morgan <graham@grahammorgan.name> - 2016-01-10 19:04 -0600
  Re: number 28   <nisesabe@aqui.no.es> - 2015-12-27 20:10 +0100
    Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-27 11:42 -0800
      Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-27 11:47 -0800
        Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:09 -0800
          Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:12 -0800
            Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:15 -0800
              Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:26 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-10 10:23 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-10 12:14 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-10 16:28 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-11 10:21 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-11 10:37 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-13 10:56 -0800
    Re: number 28 Jens Stuckelberger <Jens_Stuckelberger@nowhere.net> - 2015-12-28 03:10 +0000

csiph-web