Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #540476

Re: number 28

Message-ID <5677257C.33F6@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2015-12-20 14:02 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics, sci.math, alt.2600
Subject Re: number 28
References <5675C906.991@ix.netcom.com> <n561ni$3q0$1@dont-email.me> <5677006F.E31@ix.netcom.com> <n5734g$4mp$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Poutnik wrote:
> 
> Dne 20/12/2015 v 20:24 The Starmaker napsal(a):
> 
> >
> >
> > skip 50 (i don't know how it got in there, must  be some mistake)
> >
> 
> Yes, your mistake. It is not numerology.
> 


well how did the number 50 get in there...it doesn't fit the pattern?



Poutnik wrote:
> 
> Dne 19/12/2015 v 22:15 The Starmaker napsal(a):
> > http://www.engadget.com/2015/12/18/log-into-most-any-linux-system-by-hitting-backspace-28-times/
> >
> >
> > i discovered the number 28
> > works on other systems too!
> >
> > for example on twitter
> > when you get the
> > message you used up
> > following limit...
> > you hit 28
> > and you bypass the limit!
> >
> > Is number 28 a magic number?
> >
> Yes, 28 IS one of "magic numbers", in context of nuclear physics. :-)
> 
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_number_%28physics%29
> 
> Quote:
> In nuclear physics, a magic number is a number of nucleons (either
> protons or neutrons) such that they are arranged into complete shells
> within the atomic nucleus. The seven most widely recognized magic
> numbers as of 2007 are 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, and 126.

well there is a 2, in 28

then you have  2, 8, 

which is 28

then 20,


which is 2, 8, 20 = a 28

then you have 28,


skip 50 (i don't know how it got in there, must  be some mistake)

then you have 126, 6 +2 is 8 that's 1 28


it must be magic.


Do they have backspace on ATM machines? I'll wait to the 28th to try it!

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-19 13:15 -0800
  Re: number 28 chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-19 17:10 -0600
    Re: number 28 deathby@snu-snu.com (Phillip J. Fry) - 2015-12-20 00:31 +0000
      Re: number 28 chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-19 21:38 -0600
    Re: number 28 FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2015-12-20 08:27 -0500
      Re: number 28 Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2015-12-20 10:15 -0500
  Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-19 21:43 -0800
    Re: number 28 G. Morgan <sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> - 2015-12-22 12:36 -0600
      Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 10:55 -0800
        Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 20:21 +0100
          Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 12:02 -0800
            Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 21:11 +0100
          Re: number 28 G. Morgan <graham@grahammorgan.name> - 2016-01-10 18:58 -0600
        Re: number 28 G. Morgan <graham@grahammorgan.name> - 2016-01-10 18:53 -0600
  Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 12:02 +0100
    Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-20 11:24 -0800
      Re: number 28 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 11:54 -0800
      Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 21:32 +0100
        Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-20 14:02 -0800
          Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 23:18 +0100
            Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-21 13:49 -0800
              Re: number 28 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-21 16:09 -0600
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 11:06 -0800
                Re: number 28 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-27 18:31 -0600
              Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 09:49 +0100
      Re: number 28 G. Morgan <graham@grahammorgan.name> - 2016-01-10 19:04 -0600
  Re: number 28   <nisesabe@aqui.no.es> - 2015-12-27 20:10 +0100
    Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-27 11:42 -0800
      Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-27 11:47 -0800
        Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:09 -0800
          Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:12 -0800
            Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:15 -0800
              Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:26 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-10 10:23 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-10 12:14 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-10 16:28 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-11 10:21 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-11 10:37 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-13 10:56 -0800
    Re: number 28 Jens Stuckelberger <Jens_Stuckelberger@nowhere.net> - 2015-12-28 03:10 +0000

csiph-web