Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #76617
| From | Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: Good or bad idea |
| Organization | Medical Communicators |
| References | <coCdncR674qRCuDInZ2dnUU7-XudnZ2d@earthlink.com> <teydndcb37zbUuDInZ2dnUU7-VmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Date | 2015-06-14 17:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <f_KdnYN8E5vLbeDInZ2dnUU7-amdnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink) |
In article <teydndcb37zbUuDInZ2dnUU7-VmdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
"W" <persistentone@spamarrest.com> wrote:
>
>
> If you want to avoid those problems for a spouse, you make the account joint
> tenancy. As long as one of the persons named on the account title survives
> the death of the other person, that surviving person will still have access
> to the account while the estate settles.
>
All are JT, but she will need to get into the accounts. Some of them
aren't in local banks and will have to be done over the phone or
online. Two of the problems I hadn't thought about were getting into the
husband's email account to get the names amd addresses of some of the
advisors. One of the biggest hassles for the lady who was writing about
her troubles was trying to get his FB account killed off or
memorialized, or whatever when things calmed down. And then there are
some we both use where the passwords need to occassionaly get re-entered
(she'd be REALLY upset if she couldn't get to Pandora), and the Apple
account is in my name as is Sprint. It isn't just the financial things,
passwords are needed for all sorts of weird shit in our lives any more.
> forgets the password or doesn't understand the encryption technology. Low
> tech might make more sense. Encryption makes sense when the data is stored
> on a computer or on a public network.
I am looking at low tech, I guess we sometimes so enamored of the tech
that we don't even look for the simple answers.
--
³Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive,
but what they conceal is vital.²
‹ Aaron Levenstein
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 11:00 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-14 11:45 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 12:48 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-14 21:13 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 21:41 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-14 17:21 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-15 13:13 +1200
Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-15 08:19 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-14 22:20 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-15 08:21 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 11:47 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 12:09 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea billy@MIX.COM - 2015-06-14 18:19 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 17:06 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-06-14 21:32 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 15:21 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-06-15 15:32 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 02:18 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-06-16 15:26 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-15 21:41 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 03:48 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-06-16 15:28 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-15 13:11 +1200
Re: Good or bad idea nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-06-14 23:05 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 15:23 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2015-06-14 15:19 -0700
Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-15 13:19 +1200
Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-14 17:26 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-15 09:12 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-06-14 19:06 -0700
Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-15 09:16 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-16 09:15 +1200
Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-15 19:44 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 03:01 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2015-06-15 20:06 -0700
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 05:19 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-16 11:00 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 12:51 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-06-16 20:50 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 08:47 -0700
Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-15 09:10 +1200
Re: Good or bad idea Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-06-14 12:06 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 12:12 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-06-14 21:50 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 15:37 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea "W" <persistentone@spamarrest.com> - 2015-06-14 12:00 -0700
Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 17:21 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 16:10 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-06-15 15:14 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-06-15 18:57 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 02:54 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-15 23:56 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 06:02 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-16 21:10 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2015-06-16 18:18 -0700
Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-17 13:38 +1200
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-18 04:12 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-06-18 11:56 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 06:52 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-06-17 12:12 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-18 04:03 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-06-18 11:56 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 08:20 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-06-16 10:20 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-06-16 21:06 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-17 13:12 +1200
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 23:17 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 02:25 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 15:58 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-15 09:15 +1200
Re: Good or bad idea Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-06-15 08:54 -0400
csiph-web