Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #76667
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: Good or bad idea |
| Date | 2015-06-15 15:14 +0000 |
| Organization | Piglet's Pickles & Preserves |
| Message-ID | <cu88fiFh0g5U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <coCdncR674qRCuDInZ2dnUU7-XudnZ2d@earthlink.com> <teydndcb37zbUuDInZ2dnUU7-VmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <f_KdnYN8E5vLbeDInZ2dnUU7-amdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <p2qtna9cpmm2jsbpa3g4thtvbolbrfjl7l@4ax.com> |
On 2015-06-15, John <Man@the.keyboard> wrote:
[17 lines snipped]
> If the survivor needs or likes an account, let them just *use* it. I
> use my wife's email account after three years. I don't send anything
> from it I just keep it because it's a nice name and I think it would
> be creepy to let anyone else have it.
My mother still uses my 10-years-dead father's AOL account, for the
same reasons as you.
> With the money accounts in banks, you should enable the surviving
> spouse to be able to access those online to drain them into her
> accounts. If she can do that, and stop or move any direct debits and
> standing orders then it doesn't *matter* whether the account is closed
> or not.
There's a process for this already; it's called "probate".
--
Today is Sweetmorn, the 20th day of Confusion in the YOLD 3181
I don't have an attitude problem.
If you have a problem with my attitude, that's your problem.
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 11:00 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-14 11:45 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 12:48 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-14 21:13 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 21:41 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-14 17:21 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-15 13:13 +1200
Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-15 08:19 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-14 22:20 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-15 08:21 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 11:47 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 12:09 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea billy@MIX.COM - 2015-06-14 18:19 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 17:06 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-06-14 21:32 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 15:21 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-06-15 15:32 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 02:18 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-06-16 15:26 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-15 21:41 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 03:48 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-06-16 15:28 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-15 13:11 +1200
Re: Good or bad idea nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-06-14 23:05 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 15:23 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2015-06-14 15:19 -0700
Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-15 13:19 +1200
Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-14 17:26 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-15 09:12 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-06-14 19:06 -0700
Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-15 09:16 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-16 09:15 +1200
Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-15 19:44 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 03:01 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2015-06-15 20:06 -0700
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 05:19 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-16 11:00 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 12:51 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-06-16 20:50 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 08:47 -0700
Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-15 09:10 +1200
Re: Good or bad idea Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-06-14 12:06 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 12:12 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-06-14 21:50 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 15:37 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea "W" <persistentone@spamarrest.com> - 2015-06-14 12:00 -0700
Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 17:21 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 16:10 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-06-15 15:14 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-06-15 18:57 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 02:54 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-15 23:56 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 06:02 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-16 21:10 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2015-06-16 18:18 -0700
Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-17 13:38 +1200
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-18 04:12 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-06-18 11:56 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 06:52 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-06-17 12:12 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-18 04:03 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-06-18 11:56 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 08:20 -0400
Re: Good or bad idea Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-06-16 10:20 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-06-16 21:06 +0000
Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-17 13:12 +1200
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 23:17 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 02:25 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 15:58 +0100
Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-15 09:15 +1200
Re: Good or bad idea Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-06-15 08:54 -0400
csiph-web