Re: Good or bad idea

From	Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.mac.system
Subject	Re: Good or bad idea
Date	2015-06-15 13:13 +1200
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<150620151313145607%YourName@YourISP.com> (permalink)
References	<coCdncR674qRCuDInZ2dnUU7-XudnZ2d@earthlink.com> <557da19f$0$54661$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> <barmar-53BB1F.17212314062015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <barmar-53BB1F.17212314062015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>,
Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> In article <557da19f$0$54661$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>,
>  JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> > Kurt Ullman wrote:
> > >
> > > thinking about putting this information (for both of us) on encrypted 
> > > thumb drives and putting them in the safety deposit boxes with the 
> > > wills.
> > 
> > In Québec, the only will that counts is the one stored at a central
> > faciity, registered by a notary. So when someone dies, you get a
> > notarized/stapmped copy of the will from the notary who gets it from the
> > the central database. (notaries used to keep the wills in their safes,
> > but became huge hassle when notaries retired and handed stuff to some
> > other notary)
> > 
> > So the thumb drive with the will idea would not work.
> 
> The thumb drive is for passwords, not the will itself. What does the 
> legitimacy of the will have to do with where he stores all his passwords?

Only that apparently a will in Quebec has to be stored by an official,
who probably doesn't want or can't have extra rubbish like thumb drives
clogging up the place. You could of course still keep the thumb drive
somewhere safe yourself, just not with the actual will.

Thread

Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 11:00 -0400
  Re: Good or bad idea JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-14 11:45 -0400
    Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 12:48 -0400
      Re: Good or bad idea JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-14 21:13 -0400
        Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 21:41 -0400
    Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-14 17:21 -0400
      Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-15 13:13 +1200
        Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-15 08:19 -0400
      Re: Good or bad idea JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-14 22:20 -0400
        Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-15 08:21 -0400
  Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 11:47 -0400
    Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 12:09 -0400
      Re: Good or bad idea billy@MIX.COM - 2015-06-14 18:19 +0000
        Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 17:06 -0400
          Re: Good or bad idea Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-06-14 21:32 +0000
            Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 15:21 +0100
              Re: Good or bad idea Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-06-15 15:32 +0000
                Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 02:18 +0100
                Re: Good or bad idea Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-06-16 15:26 +0000
              Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-15 21:41 -0400
                Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 03:48 +0100
                Re: Good or bad idea Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-06-16 15:28 +0000
          Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-15 13:11 +1200
            Re: Good or bad idea nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-06-14 23:05 -0400
            Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 15:23 +0100
        Re: Good or bad idea Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2015-06-14 15:19 -0700
          Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-15 13:19 +1200
      Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-14 17:26 -0400
        Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-15 09:12 -0400
      Re: Good or bad idea gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-06-14 19:06 -0700
        Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-15 09:16 -0400
          Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-16 09:15 +1200
            Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-15 19:44 -0400
              Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 03:01 +0100
                Re: Good or bad idea Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2015-06-15 20:06 -0700
                Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 05:19 +0100
                Re: Good or bad idea Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-06-16 11:00 -0400
                Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 12:51 -0400
                Re: Good or bad idea Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-06-16 20:50 -0400
  Re: Good or bad idea Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 08:47 -0700
    Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-15 09:10 +1200
  Re: Good or bad idea Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-06-14 12:06 -0400
    Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 12:12 -0400
      Re: Good or bad idea Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-06-14 21:50 -0400
      Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 15:37 +0100
      Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 15:47 +0100
  Re: Good or bad idea "W" <persistentone@spamarrest.com> - 2015-06-14 12:00 -0700
    Re: Good or bad idea Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-14 17:21 -0400
      Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 16:10 +0100
        Re: Good or bad idea Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-06-15 15:14 +0000
          Re: Good or bad idea Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-06-15 18:57 +0100
            Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 02:54 +0100
              Re: Good or bad idea JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-15 23:56 -0400
                Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 06:02 +0100
                Re: Good or bad idea JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-06-16 21:10 -0400
                Re: Good or bad idea Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2015-06-16 18:18 -0700
                Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-17 13:38 +1200
                Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-18 04:12 +0100
                Re: Good or bad idea Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-06-18 11:56 +0000
                Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 06:52 -0400
                Re: Good or bad idea Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-06-17 12:12 +0000
                Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-18 04:03 +0100
                Re: Good or bad idea Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-06-18 11:56 +0000
                Re: Good or bad idea Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 08:20 -0400
              Re: Good or bad idea Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-06-16 10:20 +0100
                Re: Good or bad idea Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-06-16 21:06 +0000
                Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-17 13:12 +1200
                Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 23:17 +0100
          Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-16 02:25 +0100
    Re: Good or bad idea John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2015-06-15 15:58 +0100
  Re: Good or bad idea Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-06-15 09:15 +1200
  Re: Good or bad idea Aldo Raine <apache@scalpem.net> - 2015-06-15 08:54 -0400

csiph-web