Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #403423

Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio

Show all headers | View raw

Am 29.12.2016 14:53, schrieb David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller:
> Dec 28Thomas Heger
> Am 29.12.2016 05:25, schrieb David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller:
>> If Units of Mass is Directly Analogous to units of Time, Then the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio
>
> The question is still unsolved: what actually is mass?
>
> I compare the features of mass to the stability of a gyroscope.
>
> This spinning device is trying to stabilize its own axis of spin.
>
> I believe the question of what mass really is could be resolved with a proper model of the architecture of the Aether of Space Time
>
> solve (3^4/2^2 * (1e+3*pi)^2 /0.666659497  ) = 299792458
>
> http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+(3%5E4%2F2%5E2+*+(1e%2B3*pi)%5E2+%2F0.666659497++)


I had tried to associate a cross product to natural patterns.

A cross product is used for spinning systems (like a gyroscope).

So I have an axis and something spinning around.

Now this picture is too oriented and we need to have more spherical 
patterns.

So we need three perpendicular axis of time and around it rotational 
patterns.

This would be shells around a mass and that would be: an atom.

Only this is a pattern and more or less nothing.

So the question is, whether or not you could create matter out of nothing.

The opposite would be: vanishing matter without a trace.

And for both exist examples.

One example for matter out of nowhere is called 'magic dust'.

This is dust without an obvious source at unusual places.

Another example is 'Growing Earth'.

For vanishing matter exists one famous example: 9/11.

The twin-towers went actually missing and 2/3 of the material was simply 
gone (see - for instance- 'Where did the Towers go?' by Judy Wood.)

Since your formula does not contain a cross product, you apparently 
missed an important point.

A good starting point would be the twenty original quaternion formulas 
by James Clark Maxwell.

His theories got crippled by Heaviside, who introduced the grossly 
inappropriate concept of vectors instead of quaternions, since 
quaternions are much better for fluids and similar.

So instead of Heaviside's reform, the way should better have gone into 
the direction of bi-quaternions.

Vectors are based on the idea of linear relations and sums, while 
quaternions are based on the idea of multiplicative connections and curves.

And straight lines are simply not found in nature. Neither found are 
circles, since the world we inhabit has volume.

TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-28 20:25 -0800
  Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-28 20:50 -0800
  Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio   is Really a Time Ratio Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-12-29 05:55 +0100
    Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio   is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 05:53 -0800
      Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron   ratio   is Really a Time Ratio Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-12-30 04:41 +0100
        Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron   ratio   is Really a Time Ratio Sharleen Hagans <nnnsaa@nnnsaa.org> - 2016-12-30 03:51 +0000
          Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron   ratio   is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 20:08 -0800
          Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron     ratio   is Really a Time Ratio Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-01-01 06:14 +0100
        Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron   ratio   is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 20:07 -0800
  If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 07:27 -0800
    If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 12:07 -0800
      If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 13:05 -0800
        Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 13:19 -0800
          Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 14:16 -0800
            Re: If Mass is Directly Analogous to Time, The the Proton Electron ratio is Really a Time Ratio "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 19:49 -0800

csiph-web